Assessing geometric microliths as cultural markers through an analysis of shape variation and projectile performance

European geometric microlith shape variation is often used as a marker of cultural differences between groups of Mesolithic hunter gatherers and/or Neolithic farmers. Indeed, the 2D plan-view shape of these lithics is known to vary in spatially and temporally systematic ways between archaeological sites. Such differences are well evidenced in the Iberian Peninsula between the 9th and 8th millennia BP. Here we test an alternative hypothesis for the structured variation observed in geometric microliths: whether their plan-view shape significantly impacts the force, energy and displacement experienced when they are used as projectile tips. If functional differences between groups help to explain the shape variation observed in the archaeological record, then any role for cultural (non-functional social) explanations is potentially reduced. We undertook controlled static penetration tests using an Instron materials tester and an assemblage of replicated Iberian geometric microliths hafted to standardised wooden shafts. Results indicate that the maximum force required, energy used, and displacement at maximum force experienced by these hafted geometric microliths when used as projectile armatures is not significantly influenced by their 2D plan-view shape. Rather, gross form attributes such as maximum thickness, distance from the tip of the microlith to the start of the shaft, and the maximum width of the hafting substrate/adhesive are the greatest determinants of penetration ease, along with the positioning of the microlith when hafted. Our data therefore supports past research that proposes a cultural role for geometric microlithic shape variation in the European Mesolithic and Early Neolithic. Moreover, it highlights the functional importance of maintaining relatively thin microblades during microlith production, along with taking care to minimise the size of hafting components and the necessity to haft them in the most efficient way.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.117173
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing geometric microliths as cultural markers through an analysis of shape variation and projectile performance

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
article

Assessing geometric microliths as cultural markers through an analysis of shape variation and projectile performance

article en

Abstract

European geometric microlith shape variation is often used as a marker of cultural differences between groups of Mesolithic hunter gatherers and/or Neolithic farmers. Indeed, the 2D plan-view shape of these lithics is known to vary in spatially and temporally systematic ways between archaeological sites. Such differences are well evidenced in the Iberian Peninsula between the 9th and 8th millennia BP. Here we test an alternative hypothesis for the structured variation observed in geometric microliths: whether their plan-view shape significantly impacts the force, energy and displacement experienced when they are used as projectile tips. If functional differences between groups help to explain the shape variation observed in the archaeological record, then any role for cultural (non-functional social) explanations is potentially reduced. We undertook controlled static penetration tests using an Instron materials tester and an assemblage of replicated Iberian geometric microliths hafted to standardised wooden shafts. Results indicate that the maximum force required, energy used, and displacement at maximum force experienced by these hafted geometric microliths when used as projectile armatures is not significantly influenced by their 2D plan-view shape. Rather, gross form attributes such as maximum thickness, distance from the tip of the microlith to the start of the shaft, and the maximum width of the hafting substrate/adhesive are the greatest determinants of penetration ease, along with the positioning of the microlith when hafted. Our data therefore supports past research that proposes a cultural role for geometric microlithic shape variation in the European Mesolithic and Early Neolithic. Moreover, it highlights the functional importance of maintaining relatively thin microblades during microlith production, along with taking care to minimise the size of hafting components and the necessity to haft them in the most efficient way.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.