From Sontaku To Transparency: A Comparative Analysis Of Media Coverage, Cultural Dynamics, And Accountability In The Sexual Abuse Scandals Of Johnny Kitagawa And Harvey Weinstein

This thesis examined the cultural underpinnings of media coverage and accountability in high-profile sexual abuse scandals, comparing the cases of Johnny Kitagawa in Japan and Harvey Weinstein in the United States. By analyzing the concept of sontaku (Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sontaku) —a cultural practice of anticipating and fulfilling the unspoken expectations of those in power—it explored how this dynamic contributed to Japanese media’s reluctance to report on Kitagawa’s abuses (see Appendix C). In contrast, the Weinstein scandal underscored the role of investigative journalism in the United States, which exposed misconduct, galvanized the #MeToo movement (Carlsen et al., 2018), and promoted transparency and accountability. Through a comparative case study approach, the research investigated how each scandal began, the societal reactions, and the differences in media practices shaped by cultural norms. Findings highlight significant contrasts in the media’s role in holding powerful figures accountable, emphasizing the need for ethical journalism and transparency to support victims and foster societal change. The study concludes with recommendations for increased cultural awareness and ethical media practices to prevent future abuses. As a forward-looking solution, it calls for reexamining reporting standards in emerging cases such as Sean Combs’s allegations (U.S. Attorney’s Office, 2024), advocating for a balanced and ethical approach that prioritizes justice while addressing the complexities of power dynamics and public influence. These insights aim to guide journalists, advocates, and policymakers in shaping a media environment that promotes accountability and transparency across cultures.