Healthcare professionals' perspectives on commercial milk formula marketing in the UK: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: To understand (1) healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perceptions and experiences of commercial milk formula (CMF) marketing to consumers and HCPs and (2) HCPs' perspectives on regulation of CMF marketing. SETTING: UK. DESIGN: In-person and online interviews with 41 HCPs with regular contact with pregnant women and mothers. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted from October 2019 to March 2021, focusing on experiences of CMF marketing and perceptions of legislation. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes were developed: (1) 'Industry relationships have changed and not disappeared'-some HCPs reported contact with industry ceasing due to the Baby Friendly Initiative (BFI) but contact with HCPs in other roles was believed to have increased; (2) 'Direct-to-consumer marketing presents challenges for HCPs'-to support women to make informed choices about infant feeding, HCPs felt they had to challenge misinformation families receive from the CMF industry; (3) 'System changes are needed to support informed infant feeding decisions'-HCPs wanted policy changes, including effective legislation to restrict CMF marketing to both HCPs and families. They also felt initiatives to normalise breastfeeding were important. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced contact with CMF representatives was reported by HCPs covered by the BFI but continued or increased contact was seen with other HCPs. HCPs believed CMF marketing impacted women's beliefs about infant feeding and they had to work hard to provide a balanced perspective. HCPs wanted stricter regulation of CMF marketing.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.114077
Primary Topic
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare professionals' perspectives on commercial milk formula marketing in the UK: a qualitative study.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
article

Healthcare professionals' perspectives on commercial milk formula marketing in the UK: a qualitative study.

article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To understand (1) healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perceptions and experiences of commercial milk formula (CMF) marketing to consumers and HCPs and (2) HCPs' perspectives on regulation of CMF marketing. SETTING: UK. DESIGN: In-person and online interviews with 41 HCPs with regular contact with pregnant women and mothers. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted from October 2019 to March 2021, focusing on experiences of CMF marketing and perceptions of legislation. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes were developed: (1) 'Industry relationships have changed and not disappeared'-some HCPs reported contact with industry ceasing due to the Baby Friendly Initiative (BFI) but contact with HCPs in other roles was believed to have increased; (2) 'Direct-to-consumer marketing presents challenges for HCPs'-to support women to make informed choices about infant feeding, HCPs felt they had to challenge misinformation families receive from the CMF industry; (3) 'System changes are needed to support informed infant feeding decisions'-HCPs wanted policy changes, including effective legislation to restrict CMF marketing to both HCPs and families. They also felt initiatives to normalise breastfeeding were important. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced contact with CMF representatives was reported by HCPs covered by the BFI but continued or increased contact was seen with other HCPs. HCPs believed CMF marketing impacted women's beliefs about infant feeding and they had to work hard to provide a balanced perspective. HCPs wanted stricter regulation of CMF marketing.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
World Health Organization
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.