Proprietary software has failed: a community-driven open source security proposal

Following a number of high-profile cyber attacks on UK universities, many libraries are rethinking the prevalent UK approach to library systems: a reliance on proprietary software that has failed to protect their users' data and a management approach to outsourcing systems that has reduced the numbers and skills of in-house technical staff. In this presentation, I argue for a new approach to enable libraries to take back control of their systems and their data. Open source software is not only more secure than proprietary software but allows users more control and customisation over how the software works. By working collaboratively, libraries could establish community-driven multi-tenant library systems installations using open source software to give them more control over their system security, to protect their users' lending data, and to divest themselves of third-party private library systems companies. Using examples from the Copim and the Open Book Futures project infrastructure, I'll show how open source software provides a more secure and more ethical alternative to proprietary software.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/m2mf2-t3383
Primary Topic
Open Source Software Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proprietary software has failed: a community-driven open source security proposal

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Open Source Software Innovations
article

Proprietary software has failed: a community-driven open source security proposal

article en

Abstract

Following a number of high-profile cyber attacks on UK universities, many libraries are rethinking the prevalent UK approach to library systems: a reliance on proprietary software that has failed to protect their users' data and a management approach to outsourcing systems that has reduced the numbers and skills of in-house technical staff. In this presentation, I argue for a new approach to enable libraries to take back control of their systems and their data. Open source software is not only more secure than proprietary software but allows users more control and customisation over how the software works. By working collaboratively, libraries could establish community-driven multi-tenant library systems installations using open source software to give them more control over their system security, to protect their users' lending data, and to divest themselves of third-party private library systems companies. Using examples from the Copim and the Open Book Futures project infrastructure, I'll show how open source software provides a more secure and more ethical alternative to proprietary software.

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
InterDigital (United States) (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Open Source Software Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Proprietary software has failed: a community-driven open source security proposal · Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS