The Impact of Motivation on Teacher Job Performance in Secondary Schools: An Empirical Analysis of Output Planning, Monitoring, and Review in Kasese District, Uganda / Dataset

Background: Teacher motivation is essential for enhancing job performance, instructional quality, and student outcomes. However, it is greatly affected by inadequate financial incentives, poor working conditions, and limited career development opportunities. This study examines the impact of motivation on teacher job performance in secondary schools in Kasese District. Methods: A cross-sectional research design was used, integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches. The study targeted 675 participants, and a final sample of 245 respondents was selected using stratified random and purposive sampling. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 26, applying descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, multiple regression, and Bayesian inference. Results: Descriptive analysis showed that 40.3% of respondents strongly agreed that financial incentives and professional development enhance motivation, while 18.0% disagreed. Pearson correlation indicated a weak positive relationship between motivation and teacher job output (r = 0.227, p < 0.05), while output monitoring (r = 0.521, p < 0.01) and review (r = 0.321, p < 0.05) had stronger effects. Regression analysis revealed that motivation alone explained 22.7% (R² = 0.227) of teacher job performance variance, while output monitoring (R² = 0.589, F = 14.071, p < 0.05) and review (R² = 0.715, F = 16.648, p < 0.05) had greater impacts. This is confirmed by failing to reject H₀₁, indicating that motivation has a limited effect on teachers’ job output compared to structured performance management strategies Conclusion: While motivation influences teacher performance, structured performance management has a stronger effect. Schools should integrate motivation strategies with systematic performance evaluation frameworks to improve teacher engagement and educational outcomes.

Publication Details

Journal
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/pt6be
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Motivation on Teacher Job Performance in Secondary Schools: An Empirical Analysis of Output Planning, Monitoring, and Review in Kasese District, Uganda / Dataset

1 citations
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
8.93
article

The Impact of Motivation on Teacher Job Performance in Secondary Schools: An Empirical Analysis of Output Planning, Monitoring, and Review in Kasese District, Uganda / Dataset

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Teacher motivation is essential for enhancing job performance, instructional quality, and student outcomes. However, it is greatly affected by inadequate financial incentives, poor working conditions, and limited career development opportunities. This study examines the impact of motivation on teacher job performance in secondary schools in Kasese District. Methods: A cross-sectional research design was used, integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches. The study targeted 675 participants, and a final sample of 245 respondents was selected using stratified random and purposive sampling. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 26, applying descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, multiple regression, and Bayesian inference. Results: Descriptive analysis showed that 40.3% of respondents strongly agreed that financial incentives and professional development enhance motivation, while 18.0% disagreed. Pearson correlation indicated a weak positive relationship between motivation and teacher job output (r = 0.227, p < 0.05), while output monitoring (r = 0.521, p < 0.01) and review (r = 0.321, p < 0.05) had stronger effects. Regression analysis revealed that motivation alone explained 22.7% (R² = 0.227) of teacher job performance variance, while output monitoring (R² = 0.589, F = 14.071, p < 0.05) and review (R² = 0.715, F = 16.648, p < 0.05) had greater impacts. This is confirmed by failing to reject H₀₁, indicating that motivation has a limited effect on teachers’ job output compared to structured performance management strategies Conclusion: While motivation influences teacher performance, structured performance management has a stronger effect. Schools should integrate motivation strategies with systematic performance evaluation frameworks to improve teacher engagement and educational outcomes.

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.