Iran Vs Israel: Who Wins, Who Loses—and Why Everyone May Pay the Price

This paper offers a strategic and symbolic analysis of the Iran–Israel conflict through the lens of power equilibrium, regional memory, and global consequences. It avoids the binary of "supporting sides" and instead addresses the deeper structural trauma and political recursion present in both nations' narratives. The study connects military doctrine, media symbolism, religious identity, and energy security, arguing that the escalating confrontation may trigger far-reaching geopolitical repercussions — not just for the Middle East, but for the architecture of international order. Drawing from the framework of the Third Generation in International Relations, the paper challenges traditional realism and seeks a new ethical compass for global analysis.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/9skb6-wk627
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Iran Vs Israel: Who Wins, Who Loses—and Why Everyone May Pay the Price

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
article

Iran Vs Israel: Who Wins, Who Loses—and Why Everyone May Pay the Price

article en

Abstract

This paper offers a strategic and symbolic analysis of the Iran–Israel conflict through the lens of power equilibrium, regional memory, and global consequences. It avoids the binary of "supporting sides" and instead addresses the deeper structural trauma and political recursion present in both nations' narratives. The study connects military doctrine, media symbolism, religious identity, and energy security, arguing that the escalating confrontation may trigger far-reaching geopolitical repercussions — not just for the Middle East, but for the architecture of international order. Drawing from the framework of the Third Generation in International Relations, the paper challenges traditional realism and seeks a new ethical compass for global analysis.

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Third Way (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.