Artificial Intelligence and Synthetic Authority: An Impersonal Grammar of Power

This article offers a critical reading of the power exerted by artificial intelligence systems, from both linguistic and historical perspectives. Introducing the concept of synthetic authority, it examines how algorithmic technologies legitimize themselves through impersonal grammars — discursive structures that erase subjectivity and naturalize obedience. A genealogical approach connects this authority with earlier historical devices — the Church, modern science, and bureaucratic rationality — showing that AI represents a technical culmination of impersonal power. Tools from discourse analysis and critical theory are applied to reveal how the linguistic form of AI-generated statements reinforces perceived legitimacy while effacing human agency. This study is part of a broader research project developed in the unpublished manuscript Grammars of Power.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/v34tm-kt798
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and Synthetic Authority: An Impersonal Grammar of Power

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Intelligence and Synthetic Authority: An Impersonal Grammar of Power

article en

Abstract

This article offers a critical reading of the power exerted by artificial intelligence systems, from both linguistic and historical perspectives. Introducing the concept of synthetic authority, it examines how algorithmic technologies legitimize themselves through impersonal grammars — discursive structures that erase subjectivity and naturalize obedience. A genealogical approach connects this authority with earlier historical devices — the Church, modern science, and bureaucratic rationality — showing that AI represents a technical culmination of impersonal power. Tools from discourse analysis and critical theory are applied to reveal how the linguistic form of AI-generated statements reinforces perceived legitimacy while effacing human agency. This study is part of a broader research project developed in the unpublished manuscript Grammars of Power.

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY), University of Palermo (AR), Universidad La República (CL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.