The Implementation of Restorative Practices in North Carolina Public Elementary Schools

<p style="font-weight: 400;">This study evaluates the state of implementation of Restorative Practices (RPs) across 14 North Carolina public elementary school districts. This research strives to answer whether well-funded public North Carolina elementary schools have successfully implemented RPs compared to lower-funded North Carolina public elementary schools. Studying the implementation of RPs within public North Carolina elementary schools is important for several reasons. Missed classroom time hinders children and youth from receiving education, securing future employment, and participating fully in our democracy. Furthermore, existing research highlighting RP implementation within middle and high schools demonstrates that RPs have the potential to work when implemented successfully. Therefore, additional research on RP implementation in elementary schools is crucial, as this period is essential for instilling positive behavior patterns within children. There currently does not exist robust research on the state of RPs within North Carolina public elementary schools. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this study incorporates quantitative data on school funding and demographic factors with qualitative insights gathered through surveys, an interview, and RP workshops. The findings in this thesis reveal that while RPs are implemented in both low- and well-funded North Carolina public elementary schools, there exists challenges in successful implementation. Challenges to implementation include lack of implementation data and teacher resistance to RPs. Ultimately, the findings in my research underscore the need for 1. A systematic measure to understand RP implementation across North Carolina public school districts, 2. Greater use of implementation data, 3. Increased investment in resources to support staff buy-in, and 4. Increased district wide access to RPs. Given that my research is one of the first to explore RP implementation across North Carolina public elementary schools, my research highlights several future research opportunities to explore. Key future research opportunities include teacher perceptions of RPs and its effect on implementation, parent and caregivers&rsquo; approaches to discipline and its effects on RP implementation within schools, the relationship between children with high Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) scores and the effects that RPs have on their social-emotional learning (SEL), and longitudinal studies to reveal potential causal relationships of RPs with factors including educational attainment.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/c444-jt91
Primary Topic
Education Discipline and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Implementation of Restorative Practices in North Carolina Public Elementary Schools

UNC Libraries
Education Discipline and Inequality
article

The Implementation of Restorative Practices in North Carolina Public Elementary Schools

article en

Abstract

<p style="font-weight: 400;">This study evaluates the state of implementation of Restorative Practices (RPs) across 14 North Carolina public elementary school districts. This research strives to answer whether well-funded public North Carolina elementary schools have successfully implemented RPs compared to lower-funded North Carolina public elementary schools. Studying the implementation of RPs within public North Carolina elementary schools is important for several reasons. Missed classroom time hinders children and youth from receiving education, securing future employment, and participating fully in our democracy. Furthermore, existing research highlighting RP implementation within middle and high schools demonstrates that RPs have the potential to work when implemented successfully. Therefore, additional research on RP implementation in elementary schools is crucial, as this period is essential for instilling positive behavior patterns within children. There currently does not exist robust research on the state of RPs within North Carolina public elementary schools. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this study incorporates quantitative data on school funding and demographic factors with qualitative insights gathered through surveys, an interview, and RP workshops. The findings in this thesis reveal that while RPs are implemented in both low- and well-funded North Carolina public elementary schools, there exists challenges in successful implementation. Challenges to implementation include lack of implementation data and teacher resistance to RPs. Ultimately, the findings in my research underscore the need for 1. A systematic measure to understand RP implementation across North Carolina public school districts, 2. Greater use of implementation data, 3. Increased investment in resources to support staff buy-in, and 4. Increased district wide access to RPs. Given that my research is one of the first to explore RP implementation across North Carolina public elementary schools, my research highlights several future research opportunities to explore. Key future research opportunities include teacher perceptions of RPs and its effect on implementation, parent and caregivers&rsquo; approaches to discipline and its effects on RP implementation within schools, the relationship between children with high Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) scores and the effects that RPs have on their social-emotional learning (SEL), and longitudinal studies to reveal potential causal relationships of RPs with factors including educational attainment.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Education Discipline and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.