Sense of belonging in lesbian, gay, and bisexual people in the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional data

Belonging in relevant social groups and communities is an important psychological need and can perform many positive functions for identity and psychological wellbeing. This is especially true of members of stigmatized minority groups, such as lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people, who may face rejection, marginalization, and rejection due to their identity. Belonging can be conceptualized in terms of its cognitive and affective dimensions. In the two cross-sectional survey studies, belonging was operationalized as LGB community connectedness (cognitive) and LGB community pride (affective), and the factors that predict them were examined. It was hypothesized that general support and outness as LGB would be positively, and exposure to minority stressors negatively, associated with LGB community connectedness and pride. Study 1, based on a sample of 154 LGB people in the United Kingdom (UK), showed that outness was positively, and internalized homonegativity negatively, associated with LGB community connectedness. Study 2, based on a sample of 295 LGB people in the UK, showed that being female, outness, and stigma sensitivity were positively, and age and internalized homonegativity negatively, associated with LGB community pride. In both studies, internalized homonegativity was the strongest predictor of LGB community connectedness and pride, comprising the majority of the explained variance in both variables. The findings suggest that interventions to reduce feelings of internalized homonegativity and to facilitate outness may enhance belonging in LGB people. A focus on gay and bisexual men and older LGB people who generally report lower LGB community pride would be especially impactful.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Science Framework
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/7mp64
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sense of belonging in lesbian, gay, and bisexual people in the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional data

Open Science Framework
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Sense of belonging in lesbian, gay, and bisexual people in the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional data

article en

Abstract

Belonging in relevant social groups and communities is an important psychological need and can perform many positive functions for identity and psychological wellbeing. This is especially true of members of stigmatized minority groups, such as lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people, who may face rejection, marginalization, and rejection due to their identity. Belonging can be conceptualized in terms of its cognitive and affective dimensions. In the two cross-sectional survey studies, belonging was operationalized as LGB community connectedness (cognitive) and LGB community pride (affective), and the factors that predict them were examined. It was hypothesized that general support and outness as LGB would be positively, and exposure to minority stressors negatively, associated with LGB community connectedness and pride. Study 1, based on a sample of 154 LGB people in the United Kingdom (UK), showed that outness was positively, and internalized homonegativity negatively, associated with LGB community connectedness. Study 2, based on a sample of 295 LGB people in the UK, showed that being female, outness, and stigma sensitivity were positively, and age and internalized homonegativity negatively, associated with LGB community pride. In both studies, internalized homonegativity was the strongest predictor of LGB community connectedness and pride, comprising the majority of the explained variance in both variables. The findings suggest that interventions to reduce feelings of internalized homonegativity and to facilitate outness may enhance belonging in LGB people. A focus on gay and bisexual men and older LGB people who generally report lower LGB community pride would be especially impactful.

Open Science Framework
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sense of belonging in lesbian, gay, and bisexual people in the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional data · Open Science Framework (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS