“It’s just hormones”: A systematic review for the symptoms and characteristics of Postpartum Psychosis

There is no current consensus on where PPP best aligns in terms of other psychological disorders. The question of whether PPP constitutes a distinct disorder or if it should be characterised by bipolar disorder/brief psychotic disorder etc, is contentious (Sharma et al., 2022). It has been suggested that the pattern and nature of PPP more strongly aligns with affective mood disorders, namely bipolar disorders, as opposed to an organic brief psychotic disorder (Bergink et al., 2015). To date, there have been no rigorous attempts to classify and organise the psycho-structural elements of PPP like other psychological disorders. Kamperman et al. (2017) explored the phenotypical characteristics and proposed three symptom profiles via a clinical cohort study (Manic, Depressive and Atypical). Sharma et al. (2022) conducted what they called a selective appraisal of the literature on phenomenology, nosology and treatment of PPP and found that there is a lack of consensus about the diagnostic criteria for PPP. Perry et al. (2021) also conducted a review on the phenomenology, epidemiology and aetiology, finding no universally accepted definition of PPP and called for the nosology to be further researched. To understand the nosology of PPP, the symptomology and characteristics need to be well defined.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Science Framework
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/wuy94
Primary Topic
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“It’s just hormones”: A systematic review for the symptoms and characteristics of Postpartum Psychosis

Open Science Framework
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
article

“It’s just hormones”: A systematic review for the symptoms and characteristics of Postpartum Psychosis

article en

Abstract

There is no current consensus on where PPP best aligns in terms of other psychological disorders. The question of whether PPP constitutes a distinct disorder or if it should be characterised by bipolar disorder/brief psychotic disorder etc, is contentious (Sharma et al., 2022). It has been suggested that the pattern and nature of PPP more strongly aligns with affective mood disorders, namely bipolar disorders, as opposed to an organic brief psychotic disorder (Bergink et al., 2015). To date, there have been no rigorous attempts to classify and organise the psycho-structural elements of PPP like other psychological disorders. Kamperman et al. (2017) explored the phenotypical characteristics and proposed three symptom profiles via a clinical cohort study (Manic, Depressive and Atypical). Sharma et al. (2022) conducted what they called a selective appraisal of the literature on phenomenology, nosology and treatment of PPP and found that there is a lack of consensus about the diagnostic criteria for PPP. Perry et al. (2021) also conducted a review on the phenomenology, epidemiology and aetiology, finding no universally accepted definition of PPP and called for the nosology to be further researched. To understand the nosology of PPP, the symptomology and characteristics need to be well defined.

Open Science Framework
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.