COMPARING SOCIAL COGNITION IN INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE PERPETRATORS AND OTHER CRIMINAL OFFENDERS

This project explores whether men convicted of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) display distinct patterns of social cognitive functioning compared to other types of offenders and non-offenders. Specifically, the study assesses two core components of social cognition—empathy and emotional decoding ability—across five male groups: specialist IPVAW perpetrators (those whose violence is exclusively directed at intimate partners), generalist IPVAW perpetrators (those who have also committed violence against others), violent offenders unrelated to IPVAW, non-violent offenders, and individuals with no criminal record. The purpose of this study is threefold. First, it seeks to examine whether IPVAW perpetrators exhibit lower performance in empathy and emotion recognition compared to other offender and non-offender groups. Second, it aims to determine whether IPVAW perpetrators can be distinguished from each other—specifically, whether generalist and specialist perpetrators differ in their social cognitive profiles. Expected outcomes include a clearer understanding of the specific social cognitive weaknesses in IPVAW perpetrators and how these compare to other offender populations. The findings may inform the refinement of intervention programs by targeting deficits in empathy and emotional decoding that are particularly salient in intimate partner violence. Moreover, by including multiple comparison groups and distinguishing between types of IPVAW perpetrators, this study provides a more nuanced view of the cognitive-affective mechanisms underlying different forms of criminal behavior.

Publication Details

Journal
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/gqka3
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARING SOCIAL COGNITION IN INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE PERPETRATORS AND OTHER CRIMINAL OFFENDERS

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

COMPARING SOCIAL COGNITION IN INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE PERPETRATORS AND OTHER CRIMINAL OFFENDERS

article en

Abstract

This project explores whether men convicted of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) display distinct patterns of social cognitive functioning compared to other types of offenders and non-offenders. Specifically, the study assesses two core components of social cognition—empathy and emotional decoding ability—across five male groups: specialist IPVAW perpetrators (those whose violence is exclusively directed at intimate partners), generalist IPVAW perpetrators (those who have also committed violence against others), violent offenders unrelated to IPVAW, non-violent offenders, and individuals with no criminal record. The purpose of this study is threefold. First, it seeks to examine whether IPVAW perpetrators exhibit lower performance in empathy and emotion recognition compared to other offender and non-offender groups. Second, it aims to determine whether IPVAW perpetrators can be distinguished from each other—specifically, whether generalist and specialist perpetrators differ in their social cognitive profiles. Expected outcomes include a clearer understanding of the specific social cognitive weaknesses in IPVAW perpetrators and how these compare to other offender populations. The findings may inform the refinement of intervention programs by targeting deficits in empathy and emotional decoding that are particularly salient in intimate partner violence. Moreover, by including multiple comparison groups and distinguishing between types of IPVAW perpetrators, this study provides a more nuanced view of the cognitive-affective mechanisms underlying different forms of criminal behavior.

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.