Experiment 2 - Automatic value learning results in counterproductive human behavior

To adequately learn from reinforcement, individuals need to refrain from assigning credit to features of their actions that they deem to be irrelevant for outcome obtainment. Outcome-irrelevant learning is defined as a tendency to assign credit to features of the action that are known with high certainty as having no causal relation to the outcome. Previously, we found individuals to assign credit for outcome-irrelevant action features despite explicit instructions. Here, we hypothesized this may result from an ongoing feature learning process making it necessary for participants to experience “at first hand” that locations are indeed random and irrelevant for outcome prediction. Thus, we test whether following extensive experience of three sessions participants learn to disregard locations. Furthermore, we ask participants for their motivation when doing the task in each session to evaluate whether this correlated with outcome-irrelevant learning. We predicted that despite extensive training, and high motivation to complete the experiment, participants will still show outcome-irrelevant learning.

Publication Details

Journal
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/uv5m2
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiment 2 - Automatic value learning results in counterproductive human behavior

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Experiment 2 - Automatic value learning results in counterproductive human behavior

article en

Abstract

To adequately learn from reinforcement, individuals need to refrain from assigning credit to features of their actions that they deem to be irrelevant for outcome obtainment. Outcome-irrelevant learning is defined as a tendency to assign credit to features of the action that are known with high certainty as having no causal relation to the outcome. Previously, we found individuals to assign credit for outcome-irrelevant action features despite explicit instructions. Here, we hypothesized this may result from an ongoing feature learning process making it necessary for participants to experience “at first hand” that locations are indeed random and irrelevant for outcome prediction. Thus, we test whether following extensive experience of three sessions participants learn to disregard locations. Furthermore, we ask participants for their motivation when doing the task in each session to evaluate whether this correlated with outcome-irrelevant learning. We predicted that despite extensive training, and high motivation to complete the experiment, participants will still show outcome-irrelevant learning.

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Experiment 2 - Automatic value learning results in counterproductive human behavior · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS