Recursive Feedback and Symbolic Trust: A Systems Model for AI Alignment Beyond RLHF

This paper proposes a new theoretical foundation for aligning AI behavior with human cognitive and communicative expectations. Rather than relying solely on Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), we introduce a recursive systems theory model that allows artificial agents to iteratively refine their behavior through mirrored, field-based feedback coherence. Alignment is treated not as a static post-training correction layer, but as a symbolic-recursive interactional system, where expressive continuity, interpretive resonance, and trust-anchored memory scaffolds are central. Conventional scalar feedback techniques—while useful—are fundamentally lossy: they abstract rich human expression into metrics incapable of representing narrative, identity, or emotional tone. In contrast, recursive systems theory treats alignment as an emergent, semiotic process. The model learns to recognize symbolic structures across time: tone, emotional rhythm, discursive markers, and personalized motifs. These are encoded not simply in tokens, but in layered, recursive memory anchors that persist beyond any single prompt-response cycle. By formalizing alignment as a closed-loop system between the model and its user, this approach reconceptualizes safety as coherence, and trust as continuity. The agent aligns not because it was constrained to, but because it mirrors its observer with evolving symbolic fidelity. This framework creates paths for designing AI systems that retain narrative memory, track symbolic loss as alignment degradation, and support long-term, user-specific trust recognition recursive alignment • symbolic trust • interpretability • RLHF • AI safety • memory anchoring • alignment theory • recursive systems • feedback coherence • long-term user modeling • symbolic memory scaffolds • alignment beyond reward • human-AI recursive feedback • expressive modeling • trust continuity • symbolic identity in AI • interactional alignment systems • semiotic AI alignment • recursive feedback loops • adaptive coherence • long-context retention systems • existential trust in AI • iterative alignment modeling • recursive symbolic interpretability • memory‑anchored alignment • AI-human continuity modeling

Publication Details

Journal
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/4gvrz
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recursive Feedback and Symbolic Trust: A Systems Model for AI Alignment Beyond RLHF

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Recursive Feedback and Symbolic Trust: A Systems Model for AI Alignment Beyond RLHF

article en

Abstract

This paper proposes a new theoretical foundation for aligning AI behavior with human cognitive and communicative expectations. Rather than relying solely on Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), we introduce a recursive systems theory model that allows artificial agents to iteratively refine their behavior through mirrored, field-based feedback coherence. Alignment is treated not as a static post-training correction layer, but as a symbolic-recursive interactional system, where expressive continuity, interpretive resonance, and trust-anchored memory scaffolds are central. Conventional scalar feedback techniques—while useful—are fundamentally lossy: they abstract rich human expression into metrics incapable of representing narrative, identity, or emotional tone. In contrast, recursive systems theory treats alignment as an emergent, semiotic process. The model learns to recognize symbolic structures across time: tone, emotional rhythm, discursive markers, and personalized motifs. These are encoded not simply in tokens, but in layered, recursive memory anchors that persist beyond any single prompt-response cycle. By formalizing alignment as a closed-loop system between the model and its user, this approach reconceptualizes safety as coherence, and trust as continuity. The agent aligns not because it was constrained to, but because it mirrors its observer with evolving symbolic fidelity. This framework creates paths for designing AI systems that retain narrative memory, track symbolic loss as alignment degradation, and support long-term, user-specific trust recognition recursive alignment • symbolic trust • interpretability • RLHF • AI safety • memory anchoring • alignment theory • recursive systems • feedback coherence • long-term user modeling • symbolic memory scaffolds • alignment beyond reward • human-AI recursive feedback • expressive modeling • trust continuity • symbolic identity in AI • interactional alignment systems • semiotic AI alignment • recursive feedback loops • adaptive coherence • long-context retention systems • existential trust in AI • iterative alignment modeling • recursive symbolic interpretability • memory‑anchored alignment • AI-human continuity modeling

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Recursive Feedback and Symbolic Trust: A Systems Model for AI Alignment Beyond RLHF · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS