Perceptions of Mitigating Evidence: A Pilot Study

This study is largely exploratory in nature and represents the first of several quantitative examinations of how various mitigating and aggravating circumstances (identified using theory, law, and practice recommendations) change mock jurors’ desire to punish defendants in the context of presentence mitigation evaluations.

Publication Details

Journal
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/afq6w
Primary Topic
Jury Decision Making Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions of Mitigating Evidence: A Pilot Study

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Jury Decision Making Processes
article

Perceptions of Mitigating Evidence: A Pilot Study

article en

Abstract

This study is largely exploratory in nature and represents the first of several quantitative examinations of how various mitigating and aggravating circumstances (identified using theory, law, and practice recommendations) change mock jurors’ desire to punish defendants in the context of presentence mitigation evaluations.

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Jury Decision Making Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perceptions of Mitigating Evidence: A Pilot Study · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS