Moral Values in Moral Maze Programme

Moral Maze corpora consist of transcripts of discussions on the Moral Maze Radio 4 programme where panellists explore various moral and ethical dilemmas (Budzynska et al. 2015). For the purpose of our study, we have selected five discussions that exemplify domain diversity and uphold data quality: British Empire, DDay, Morality of Money, Morality of Hypocrisy, and Welfare State. The corpora have been previously annotated with pro- and con-arguments according to Inference Anchoring Theory. We applied moral foundation detection processes for subsequent analysis. In this study, we decided to utilise the Moral Foundation Dictionary, which offers a list of words associated with five primary moral foundation categories that are suitable for our research purposes. Reference: Landowska, A., Budzynska, K., & Zhang, H. (2024). Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Moral Foundations in Argumentation. Argumentation, 38(3), 405-434. Acknowledgement: We would like to acknowledge that the work reported in this paper has been supported in part by the Polish National Science Centre, Poland (Chist-Era IV) under grant 2022/04/Y/ST6/00001 and in part by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 860621.

Publication Details

Journal
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/3nm47
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moral Values in Moral Maze Programme

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Moral Values in Moral Maze Programme

article en

Abstract

Moral Maze corpora consist of transcripts of discussions on the Moral Maze Radio 4 programme where panellists explore various moral and ethical dilemmas (Budzynska et al. 2015). For the purpose of our study, we have selected five discussions that exemplify domain diversity and uphold data quality: British Empire, DDay, Morality of Money, Morality of Hypocrisy, and Welfare State. The corpora have been previously annotated with pro- and con-arguments according to Inference Anchoring Theory. We applied moral foundation detection processes for subsequent analysis. In this study, we decided to utilise the Moral Foundation Dictionary, which offers a list of words associated with five primary moral foundation categories that are suitable for our research purposes. Reference: Landowska, A., Budzynska, K., & Zhang, H. (2024). Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Moral Foundations in Argumentation. Argumentation, 38(3), 405-434. Acknowledgement: We would like to acknowledge that the work reported in this paper has been supported in part by the Polish National Science Centre, Poland (Chist-Era IV) under grant 2022/04/Y/ST6/00001 and in part by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 860621.

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.