Identifying and naming acts of online sexual abuse

The vignettes in the current study were developed specifically for this research and presented six scenarios involving an adolescent girl: physical rape, consensual and voluntary sexting, sextortion, non-consensual image distribution, non-consensual image distribution for revenge, and online grooming. Three questions were asked about each vignette: a. Labeling After reading each vignette, participants were asked to indicate whether they recognized in it one of the following events: rape, sextortion, online grooming, image distribution, sexting, image sharing, and revenge-based image sharing. Respondents could also answer “I don't know.” b. Sexual violence After reading each vignette, participants were asked to answer Yes or No to the question: "Is the described event a case of sexual abuse?" c. Assigned responsibility Based on Sasson and Paul (2014), participants were asked to indicate the degree of blame for the situation assigned to the victim and the abuser (“what is the girl's/boy's level of responsibility for the event?”) on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Entirely responsible) to 5 (Entirely not responsible). In all the vignettes the boy was the abuser and the girl the victim. Responsibility ratings were dichotomized for the analyses, the actors being either entirely responsible or held some degree of responsibility, or none at all.

Publication Details

Journal
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/9enyt
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying and naming acts of online sexual abuse

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Gender, Feminism, and Media
article

Identifying and naming acts of online sexual abuse

article en

Abstract

The vignettes in the current study were developed specifically for this research and presented six scenarios involving an adolescent girl: physical rape, consensual and voluntary sexting, sextortion, non-consensual image distribution, non-consensual image distribution for revenge, and online grooming. Three questions were asked about each vignette: a. Labeling After reading each vignette, participants were asked to indicate whether they recognized in it one of the following events: rape, sextortion, online grooming, image distribution, sexting, image sharing, and revenge-based image sharing. Respondents could also answer “I don't know.” b. Sexual violence After reading each vignette, participants were asked to answer Yes or No to the question: "Is the described event a case of sexual abuse?" c. Assigned responsibility Based on Sasson and Paul (2014), participants were asked to indicate the degree of blame for the situation assigned to the victim and the abuser (“what is the girl's/boy's level of responsibility for the event?”) on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Entirely responsible) to 5 (Entirely not responsible). In all the vignettes the boy was the abuser and the girl the victim. Responsibility ratings were dichotomized for the analyses, the actors being either entirely responsible or held some degree of responsibility, or none at all.

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Gender, Feminism, and Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.