Biomarkers in Pediatric Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review

This is the protocol for a systematic review aiming To evaluate and synthesize current evidence on the diagnostic, predictive, or disease-monitoring value of biomarkers in pediatric patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pNPSLE). Inclusion criteria Population: Children and adolescents (≤18 years old) diagnosed with SLE and presenting neuropsychiatric symptoms. Study Types: Original peer-reviewed studies (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional). Intervention/Exposure: Measurement of biomarkers related to neuropsychiatric involvement in SLE. Outcomes: Diagnostic accuracy, association with NP symptoms, or prognostic relevance of biomarkers. Exclusion criteria Case reports, case series, review articles. Studies without separate pediatric data. Animal studies or non-human participants. Studies without data on relevant biomarkers. Databases and Search Strategy Databases searched: We followed the PRISMA guidelines to perform a systematic literature search of articles relevant to pediatric NPSLE and biomarkers in four databases PubMed (n=24) EMBASE (n=24) Scopus (n=7) Google Scholar (n=48) A total of 29 studies were selected for data extraction and narrative synthesis.Data were extracted manually from full texts and supplementary materials. Extracted information included: author, year, country, study design, population size, NP symptomatology, biomarker type and measurement method, sensitivity/specificity, and association with NP outcomes.The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) adapted for cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies was used. Quality grading followed the AHRQ thresholds. Most studies were of poor quality due to small samples and lack of control for confounding.A qualitative synthesis was performed. No meta-analysis was conducted due to high heterogeneity in study designs, biomarkers, and outcome measures.

Publication Details

Journal
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/tkbp2
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomarkers in Pediatric Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
article

Biomarkers in Pediatric Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review

article en

Abstract

This is the protocol for a systematic review aiming To evaluate and synthesize current evidence on the diagnostic, predictive, or disease-monitoring value of biomarkers in pediatric patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pNPSLE). Inclusion criteria Population: Children and adolescents (≤18 years old) diagnosed with SLE and presenting neuropsychiatric symptoms. Study Types: Original peer-reviewed studies (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional). Intervention/Exposure: Measurement of biomarkers related to neuropsychiatric involvement in SLE. Outcomes: Diagnostic accuracy, association with NP symptoms, or prognostic relevance of biomarkers. Exclusion criteria Case reports, case series, review articles. Studies without separate pediatric data. Animal studies or non-human participants. Studies without data on relevant biomarkers. Databases and Search Strategy Databases searched: We followed the PRISMA guidelines to perform a systematic literature search of articles relevant to pediatric NPSLE and biomarkers in four databases PubMed (n=24) EMBASE (n=24) Scopus (n=7) Google Scholar (n=48) A total of 29 studies were selected for data extraction and narrative synthesis.Data were extracted manually from full texts and supplementary materials. Extracted information included: author, year, country, study design, population size, NP symptomatology, biomarker type and measurement method, sensitivity/specificity, and association with NP outcomes.The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) adapted for cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies was used. Quality grading followed the AHRQ thresholds. Most studies were of poor quality due to small samples and lack of control for confounding.A qualitative synthesis was performed. No meta-analysis was conducted due to high heterogeneity in study designs, biomarkers, and outcome measures.

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.