Productivity and financial impact as outcomes of ergonomic interventions in workplace settings: a scoping review

This scoping review aims to explore and synthesize the available evidence on the impact of ergonomic interventions in workplace settings, specifically focusing on their influence on productivity and financial outcomes. The purpose of the study is to map the existing literature, identify the types of interventions implemented across different organizational contexts, and analyze the extent to which ergonomic changes contribute not only to workers’ health and safety but also to organizational performance and economic returns. The review was designed according to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included studies retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Taylor & Francis (2005 onwards), with the last search conducted on June 25, 2025. Eligible studies were those that assessed ergonomic interventions in workplace environments and reported outcomes related to productivity (e.g., efficiency, quality, reduced absenteeism or presenteeism) and financial performance (e.g., cost–benefit, return on investment, cost reduction, economic savings). The expected outcomes of this project are: To provide a structured overview of the types of ergonomic interventions reported in the literature (physical, organizational, cognitive, participatory, or mixed approaches). To compare the evidence across different sectors (manufacturing, office, health services, childcare, and others) and highlight sector-specific trends. To identify the methodological strengths and weaknesses of existing research, particularly in relation to study design, evaluation metrics, and financial indicators. To detect research gaps, especially in underrepresented sectors such as health, education, and transport, and propose directions for future studies. By synthesizing the evidence, this scoping review is expected to demonstrate that ergonomic interventions can generate consistent but heterogeneous benefits in productivity and financial outcomes, depending on the organizational context, type of intervention, and methodological rigor. Ultimately, the findings aim to support the consideration of ergonomics not only as an occupational health strategy but also as a strategic investment for sustainable organizational performance.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Science Framework
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/mk2rn
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Productivity and financial impact as outcomes of ergonomic interventions in workplace settings: a scoping review

Open Science Framework
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Productivity and financial impact as outcomes of ergonomic interventions in workplace settings: a scoping review

article en

Abstract

This scoping review aims to explore and synthesize the available evidence on the impact of ergonomic interventions in workplace settings, specifically focusing on their influence on productivity and financial outcomes. The purpose of the study is to map the existing literature, identify the types of interventions implemented across different organizational contexts, and analyze the extent to which ergonomic changes contribute not only to workers’ health and safety but also to organizational performance and economic returns. The review was designed according to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included studies retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Taylor & Francis (2005 onwards), with the last search conducted on June 25, 2025. Eligible studies were those that assessed ergonomic interventions in workplace environments and reported outcomes related to productivity (e.g., efficiency, quality, reduced absenteeism or presenteeism) and financial performance (e.g., cost–benefit, return on investment, cost reduction, economic savings). The expected outcomes of this project are: To provide a structured overview of the types of ergonomic interventions reported in the literature (physical, organizational, cognitive, participatory, or mixed approaches). To compare the evidence across different sectors (manufacturing, office, health services, childcare, and others) and highlight sector-specific trends. To identify the methodological strengths and weaknesses of existing research, particularly in relation to study design, evaluation metrics, and financial indicators. To detect research gaps, especially in underrepresented sectors such as health, education, and transport, and propose directions for future studies. By synthesizing the evidence, this scoping review is expected to demonstrate that ergonomic interventions can generate consistent but heterogeneous benefits in productivity and financial outcomes, depending on the organizational context, type of intervention, and methodological rigor. Ultimately, the findings aim to support the consideration of ergonomics not only as an occupational health strategy but also as a strategic investment for sustainable organizational performance.

Open Science Framework
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Productivity and financial impact as outcomes of ergonomic interventions in workplace settings: a scoping review · Open Science Framework (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS