The relationship between applicants' preparation and faking in personnel selection

The present work deals with deceptive behavior by applicants in personnel selection procedures. A particular focus lies in the investigation of the connection between preparation behavior and subsequent self-presentation (i.e., impression management) in job interviews and personality tests. An emphasis is placed on deceptive impression management (i.e., faking). Drawing on a newly developed taxonomy of preparation methods, a nuanced perspective on preparation as a potential antecedent of faking was adopted. This relationship is discussed in light of several theoretical models and frameworks that have either directly or indirectly postulated a positive correlation between preparation and faking. For example, preparation may enable applicants to “mind‐read” organizations to identify key selection criteria, recognize opportunities to fake, or develop specific behavioral skills. The dissertation used different methodological approaches (such as self-reported preparation or direct manipulations of preparation), settings (e.g., experimental or a field study in a high-stakes context), and paradigms (e.g., using personality test scores as a deception criterion or using self-reported cognitive performance). The main findings are that preparation through social media (e.g., online videos from coaches or testimonials from other applicants in online forums) can be positively correlated with faking in job interviews and personality tests. By contrast, other preparatory activities (e.g., simulated interviews) showed no significant association with impression management. The present work further investigated a potential moderating role of Honesty-humility of the HEXACO personality model, a well‐established predictor of deceptive behavior. The results indicate that Honesty-humility partially moderates the effect of preparation on faking but does not moderate the effects of an increased risk to fake or an increased level of competition on applicant deception.

Publication Details

Journal
Universitätsbibliothek Kassel
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17170/kobra-2025051211136
Primary Topic
Personality Traits and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relationship between applicants' preparation and faking in personnel selection

Universitätsbibliothek Kassel
Personality Traits and Psychology
article

The relationship between applicants' preparation and faking in personnel selection

article en

Abstract

The present work deals with deceptive behavior by applicants in personnel selection procedures. A particular focus lies in the investigation of the connection between preparation behavior and subsequent self-presentation (i.e., impression management) in job interviews and personality tests. An emphasis is placed on deceptive impression management (i.e., faking). Drawing on a newly developed taxonomy of preparation methods, a nuanced perspective on preparation as a potential antecedent of faking was adopted. This relationship is discussed in light of several theoretical models and frameworks that have either directly or indirectly postulated a positive correlation between preparation and faking. For example, preparation may enable applicants to “mind‐read” organizations to identify key selection criteria, recognize opportunities to fake, or develop specific behavioral skills. The dissertation used different methodological approaches (such as self-reported preparation or direct manipulations of preparation), settings (e.g., experimental or a field study in a high-stakes context), and paradigms (e.g., using personality test scores as a deception criterion or using self-reported cognitive performance). The main findings are that preparation through social media (e.g., online videos from coaches or testimonials from other applicants in online forums) can be positively correlated with faking in job interviews and personality tests. By contrast, other preparatory activities (e.g., simulated interviews) showed no significant association with impression management. The present work further investigated a potential moderating role of Honesty-humility of the HEXACO personality model, a well‐established predictor of deceptive behavior. The results indicate that Honesty-humility partially moderates the effect of preparation on faking but does not moderate the effects of an increased risk to fake or an increased level of competition on applicant deception.

Universitätsbibliothek Kassel
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Personality Traits and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The relationship between applicants' preparation and faking in personnel selection · Universitätsbibliothek Kassel (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS