Is It Really (All) About Empathy?—A Strong Reflexivity Approach to Emotionally Charged Research Experiences

In this article, we seek to deepen the understanding and reflexive analysis of emotionally charged situations in the research process. Through a nuanced and critically evaluative approach, we explore the complex meanings of empathy as presented in the qualitative methods discourse. We argue that empathy is an overstretched concept that can be more profoundly defined when situationally contextualized. For instance, empathy may refer to solidarity in political aspirations, humanity and compassion in research ethics, or affective resonance in methodological contexts. Focusing on the latter, we examine instances of seemingly "unsuccessful "or "failed" empathy in two of our projects. Utilizing the framework of "strong reflexivity" (KUEHNER, PLODER & LANGER, 2016), we discuss methodological strategies for analyzing and interpreting emotionally challenging research encounters. We argue that situational "failures" can yield invaluable insights for critical knowledge production when examined and communicated through a reflexive lens.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.1.4344
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is It Really (All) About Empathy?—A Strong Reflexivity Approach to Emotionally Charged Research Experiences

Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Is It Really (All) About Empathy?—A Strong Reflexivity Approach to Emotionally Charged Research Experiences

article en

Abstract

In this article, we seek to deepen the understanding and reflexive analysis of emotionally charged situations in the research process. Through a nuanced and critically evaluative approach, we explore the complex meanings of empathy as presented in the qualitative methods discourse. We argue that empathy is an overstretched concept that can be more profoundly defined when situationally contextualized. For instance, empathy may refer to solidarity in political aspirations, humanity and compassion in research ethics, or affective resonance in methodological contexts. Focusing on the latter, we examine instances of seemingly "unsuccessful "or "failed" empathy in two of our projects. Utilizing the framework of "strong reflexivity" (KUEHNER, PLODER & LANGER, 2016), we discuss methodological strategies for analyzing and interpreting emotionally challenging research encounters. We argue that situational "failures" can yield invaluable insights for critical knowledge production when examined and communicated through a reflexive lens.

Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)
International Psychoanalytic University Berlin (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is It Really (All) About Empathy?—A Strong Reflexivity Approach to Emotionally Charged Research Experiences · Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS