Medical Experimentation in the Light of Article 39 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland

This article focuses on the subject matter of Article 39 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. This provision states that no one shall be subjected to scientific experimentation, including medical experimentation, without his or her voluntary consent. There are conflicting views expressed in the literature regarding the meaning of a medical experiment. It is necessary to decide whether the Constitution applies to both therapeutic and research experiments or research experiments only. The meaning of the term ‘medical experiment’ is examined against a wide background, and methods of linguistic, teleological and systemic interpretation are used. To the extent necessary, relevant international law is cited. As a result of the analysis, the conclusion is drawn that Article 39 of the Constitution does not apply to therapeutic experiments. The provision is interpreted inconsistently and creates problems in application. The conclusion is that it is necessary to consider amending the Constitution where medical experiments are concerned.

Publication Details

Journal
The Repository of University in Bialystok (University in Bialystok)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2025.30.02.04
Primary Topic
Polish Law and Legal System
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medical Experimentation in the Light of Article 39 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland

The Repository of University in Bialystok (University in Bialystok)
Polish Law and Legal System
article

Medical Experimentation in the Light of Article 39 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland

article en

Abstract

This article focuses on the subject matter of Article 39 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. This provision states that no one shall be subjected to scientific experimentation, including medical experimentation, without his or her voluntary consent. There are conflicting views expressed in the literature regarding the meaning of a medical experiment. It is necessary to decide whether the Constitution applies to both therapeutic and research experiments or research experiments only. The meaning of the term ‘medical experiment’ is examined against a wide background, and methods of linguistic, teleological and systemic interpretation are used. To the extent necessary, relevant international law is cited. As a result of the analysis, the conclusion is drawn that Article 39 of the Constitution does not apply to therapeutic experiments. The provision is interpreted inconsistently and creates problems in application. The conclusion is that it is necessary to consider amending the Constitution where medical experiments are concerned.

The Repository of University in Bialystok (University in Bialystok)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Polish Law and Legal System
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.