A Computational Turn in Digital Philology Questions

In this article we argue that digital scholarly editing still obeys a representational logic which prevents it from fully exploiting the potential of the digital medium. In fact, practices such as the encoding of data still lead to recording the results of the editorial work, consigning to oblivion the very essence of the latter, which, in our opinion, lies in the philologist’s knowledge and action. For this reason, we argue for a computational turn in philology, defining it as the use of performative code to model the processes at the basis of the creation of an edition (such as transcription, collation, stemmatological analysis, annotation etc.). It is our conviction that the introduction of programming in the realm of editing represents a major turning point in the history of philology, as it brings about a considerable increase in the accountability and reproducibility of the scholarly work, which are fundamental conditions for scientificity. To back up our arguments, we will propose two examples from our own work: the computational editions of the Early New High German version of Marco Polo’s travel account and of the Middle Dutch Of Reynaert the Fox. We will show the role and the advantages of computation in dealing with aspects such as normalisation and annotation of the texts, focusing in particularon the epistemological gains of our novel approach.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14672/fg.v14i.2534
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Computational Turn in Digital Philology Questions

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

A Computational Turn in Digital Philology Questions

article en

Abstract

In this article we argue that digital scholarly editing still obeys a representational logic which prevents it from fully exploiting the potential of the digital medium. In fact, practices such as the encoding of data still lead to recording the results of the editorial work, consigning to oblivion the very essence of the latter, which, in our opinion, lies in the philologist’s knowledge and action. For this reason, we argue for a computational turn in philology, defining it as the use of performative code to model the processes at the basis of the creation of an edition (such as transcription, collation, stemmatological analysis, annotation etc.). It is our conviction that the introduction of programming in the realm of editing represents a major turning point in the history of philology, as it brings about a considerable increase in the accountability and reproducibility of the scholarly work, which are fundamental conditions for scientificity. To back up our arguments, we will propose two examples from our own work: the computational editions of the Early New High German version of Marco Polo’s travel account and of the Middle Dutch Of Reynaert the Fox. We will show the role and the advantages of computation in dealing with aspects such as normalisation and annotation of the texts, focusing in particularon the epistemological gains of our novel approach.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.