Patient-reported questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing for central sensitization in endometriosis

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting over 2 million Canadians. It is characterised by the growth of endometrial-like lesions outside the uterus, causing debilitating pain. Standard treatments include pain medication, hormonal therapy and surgery; yet 30-50% still experience pain. Endometriosis pain includes nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic types. Nociplastic pain is characterized by central nervous system sensitization, which leads to hyperalgesia and allodynia, and provides an explanation for persistent and widespread pain. In Objective 1, I conducted a scoping review to identify tools for detecting nociplastic pain and central sensitization in endometriosis. This review listed potential clinical and research tools, including sensory tests and patient-reported questionnaires as useful proxies for central sensitization but highlighted gaps in research evaluating the efficacy of these tools. Objective 2 involved a retrospective analysis of the Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Interdisciplinary Cohort registry (EPPIC) which looked at the association between the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) with the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), central sensitivity syndromes, and patient-reported pain and quality of life. The PSQ was weakly correlated with the CSI (r=0.099, p<0.001) and showed weaker correlations with the central sensitivity syndromes (r=0.093, p<0.001) compared to the CSI (r=0.687, p<0.05). The PSQ was only associated with superficial dyspareunia (r=0.138, p<0.001) and back pain (r=0.091, p=0.014), whereas the CSI was significantly associated (i.e. p<0.05) with scores for dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, superficial dyspareunia, back pain and chronic pelvic pain. In Objective 3, an interim analysis of an ongoing prospective study examined five pain questionnaires and six sensory tests across the hand, abdomen, and deltoid. Findings indicated a significant (i.e. p<0.05) strong relationship between the Self-Administered Leeds Assessment for Neuropathic and Nociceptive Signs and Symptoms (S-LANSS) with all questionnaires, except the PSQ: Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaire (DN4; r=0.64), Michigan body map (MBM; r=0.58), and CSI (r=0.52). Additionally, pelvic mechanical hypersensitivity was linked to more widespread pain (r=0.75) and neuropathic-like symptoms (r=0.59). However, patient-reported symptoms were more strongly associated with the CSI and S-LANSS than sensory tests. Overall, endometriosis nociplastic pain is heterogeneous, and may require multiple assessment methods. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Collections
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0448628
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-reported questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing for central sensitization in endometriosis

Open Collections
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
article

Patient-reported questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing for central sensitization in endometriosis

article en

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting over 2 million Canadians. It is characterised by the growth of endometrial-like lesions outside the uterus, causing debilitating pain. Standard treatments include pain medication, hormonal therapy and surgery; yet 30-50% still experience pain. Endometriosis pain includes nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic types. Nociplastic pain is characterized by central nervous system sensitization, which leads to hyperalgesia and allodynia, and provides an explanation for persistent and widespread pain. In Objective 1, I conducted a scoping review to identify tools for detecting nociplastic pain and central sensitization in endometriosis. This review listed potential clinical and research tools, including sensory tests and patient-reported questionnaires as useful proxies for central sensitization but highlighted gaps in research evaluating the efficacy of these tools. Objective 2 involved a retrospective analysis of the Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Interdisciplinary Cohort registry (EPPIC) which looked at the association between the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) with the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), central sensitivity syndromes, and patient-reported pain and quality of life. The PSQ was weakly correlated with the CSI (r=0.099, p<0.001) and showed weaker correlations with the central sensitivity syndromes (r=0.093, p<0.001) compared to the CSI (r=0.687, p<0.05). The PSQ was only associated with superficial dyspareunia (r=0.138, p<0.001) and back pain (r=0.091, p=0.014), whereas the CSI was significantly associated (i.e. p<0.05) with scores for dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, superficial dyspareunia, back pain and chronic pelvic pain. In Objective 3, an interim analysis of an ongoing prospective study examined five pain questionnaires and six sensory tests across the hand, abdomen, and deltoid. Findings indicated a significant (i.e. p<0.05) strong relationship between the Self-Administered Leeds Assessment for Neuropathic and Nociceptive Signs and Symptoms (S-LANSS) with all questionnaires, except the PSQ: Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaire (DN4; r=0.64), Michigan body map (MBM; r=0.58), and CSI (r=0.52). Additionally, pelvic mechanical hypersensitivity was linked to more widespread pain (r=0.75) and neuropathic-like symptoms (r=0.59). However, patient-reported symptoms were more strongly associated with the CSI and S-LANSS than sensory tests. Overall, endometriosis nociplastic pain is heterogeneous, and may require multiple assessment methods. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Open Collections
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.