Between continuity and change : the ASEAN Charter and its impact on regional legitimation

This thesis investigates the influence of the ASEAN Charter on the legitimation discourses of ASEAN member states, focusing on Indonesia and Myanmar in 2023. The Charter, adopted in 2007, introduced “Western” norms such as democracy, human rights, and good governance, marking a shift from the traditional “ASEAN Way” norms which emphasized non-interference and consensus. This thesis addresses how significantly these Charter norms have reshaped the way member states justify ASEAN’s authority and governance. Using qualitative discourse analysis, I examine official statements from Indonesia, a norm entrepreneur, and Myanmar, a resistant member state, to identify references to Charter norms versus traditional ASEAN norms. Findings reveal that Indonesia frequently invokes high-level Charter norms like human rights and inclusiveness and often emphasizes concrete actions. In contrast, Myanmar predominantly references procedural norms and traditional “ASEAN Way” norms, indicating resistance to democratic normative shifts while still engaging with the Charter framework. The findings suggest a mixed normative space within ASEAN, where Charter norms compete with the pre-existing “ASEAN Way” framework. The study contributes to understanding norm diffusion in regional organizations and the ASEAN Charter’s role in shaping contemporary legitimation discourses.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Collections
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0448971
Primary Topic
Asian Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between continuity and change : the ASEAN Charter and its impact on regional legitimation

Open Collections
Asian Studies and History
article

Between continuity and change : the ASEAN Charter and its impact on regional legitimation

article en

Abstract

This thesis investigates the influence of the ASEAN Charter on the legitimation discourses of ASEAN member states, focusing on Indonesia and Myanmar in 2023. The Charter, adopted in 2007, introduced “Western” norms such as democracy, human rights, and good governance, marking a shift from the traditional “ASEAN Way” norms which emphasized non-interference and consensus. This thesis addresses how significantly these Charter norms have reshaped the way member states justify ASEAN’s authority and governance. Using qualitative discourse analysis, I examine official statements from Indonesia, a norm entrepreneur, and Myanmar, a resistant member state, to identify references to Charter norms versus traditional ASEAN norms. Findings reveal that Indonesia frequently invokes high-level Charter norms like human rights and inclusiveness and often emphasizes concrete actions. In contrast, Myanmar predominantly references procedural norms and traditional “ASEAN Way” norms, indicating resistance to democratic normative shifts while still engaging with the Charter framework. The findings suggest a mixed normative space within ASEAN, where Charter norms compete with the pre-existing “ASEAN Way” framework. The study contributes to understanding norm diffusion in regional organizations and the ASEAN Charter’s role in shaping contemporary legitimation discourses.

Open Collections
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Asian Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.