Strength-dependent positional difference (M and SE) as a function of expertise (Experts, near-expert), certainty (67%, 83%), acquisition phase (Early, late) and acquisition condition (Self-generated, explicit).

Strength-dependent positional difference (M and SE) as a function of expertise (Experts, near-expert), certainty (67%, 83%), acquisition phase (Early, late) and acquisition condition (Self-generated, explicit).

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318994.s002
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strength-dependent positional difference (M and SE) as a function of expertise (Experts, near-expert), certainty (67%, 83%), acquisition phase (Early, late) and acquisition condition (Self-generated, explicit).

Figshare
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

Strength-dependent positional difference (M and SE) as a function of expertise (Experts, near-expert), certainty (67%, 83%), acquisition phase (Early, late) and acquisition condition (Self-generated, explicit).

article en

Abstract

Strength-dependent positional difference (M and SE) as a function of expertise (Experts, near-expert), certainty (67%, 83%), acquisition phase (Early, late) and acquisition condition (Self-generated, explicit).

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Sport Psychology and Performance
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.