Le reti nel welfare locale: risorsa o nuovo vincolo?

The study explores the complex dynamics of network-based interventions within the Italian social policies, a paradigmatic case of Southern European welfare state. It sheds light on the emerging concept of “netocracyμ and highlights the critical implications of the spread of this model. Through a comparative analysis of two cases of network-based social interventions – the Family Districts (Trentino Alto-Adige) and the Integrated Actions for Territorial Cohesion (Veneto) – the research examines the evolving nature of local networks and their impact on social work practices. The findings highlight the impacts of network logic on social work and the challenges that welfare professionals face in adapting to this logics. The study thus reveals the potential that network-based approaches have for social innovation and empowerment. At thesame time, however, it underscores the risks associated with introducing network logic in fragmented and underfunded welfare contexts like Italy, showing how network-based interventions risk absorbing more resources than they generate in the absence of targeted increases in social spending. The study thus offers a critical-reflective perspective on a social intervention model that is increasingly spreading and tends to be rhetorically treated as positive.

Publication Details

Journal
ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1423/116918
Primary Topic
Italian Social Issues and Migration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Le reti nel welfare locale: risorsa o nuovo vincolo?

ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia)
Italian Social Issues and Migration
article

Le reti nel welfare locale: risorsa o nuovo vincolo?

article en

Abstract

The study explores the complex dynamics of network-based interventions within the Italian social policies, a paradigmatic case of Southern European welfare state. It sheds light on the emerging concept of “netocracyμ and highlights the critical implications of the spread of this model. Through a comparative analysis of two cases of network-based social interventions – the Family Districts (Trentino Alto-Adige) and the Integrated Actions for Territorial Cohesion (Veneto) – the research examines the evolving nature of local networks and their impact on social work practices. The findings highlight the impacts of network logic on social work and the challenges that welfare professionals face in adapting to this logics. The study thus reveals the potential that network-based approaches have for social innovation and empowerment. At thesame time, however, it underscores the risks associated with introducing network logic in fragmented and underfunded welfare contexts like Italy, showing how network-based interventions risk absorbing more resources than they generate in the absence of targeted increases in social spending. The study thus offers a critical-reflective perspective on a social intervention model that is increasingly spreading and tends to be rhetorically treated as positive.

ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Italian Social Issues and Migration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Le reti nel welfare locale: risorsa o nuovo vincolo? · ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS