Comparison of engagement gained by vaccine-related content expressing the corresponding stance to vaccine-related content conveying any other stance, within questionable sources and within reliable sources, respectively (internal comparison).
Denoted with <i>X</i> the vaccine subject covered through one of the three stances by source set Q (R) and with <i>X</i><sup><i>C</i></sup> the vaccine subject covered through the other two stances by the same source set, Table shows the results of Mann-Whitney U test applied to the distributions of the out-engage factor <i>P</i>(Q;<i>X</i>,<i>X</i><sup><i>C</i></sup>;<i>d</i>)(<i>P</i>(R;<i>X</i>,<i>X</i><sup><i>C</i></sup>;<i>d</i>)) for the days <i>d</i> when it is in favor of the vaccine subject compared to the rest of subjects discussed within the source set Q (R) and vice versa, respectively. Since the distributions have values of opposite sign (See Eq (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0316258#pone.0316258.e029" target="_blank">4</a>) in the main text), the test is applied to the distributions of absolute values. Distributions are compared according to the period analyzed: Overall (1 January 2016–31 December 2021), pre-pandemic (1 January 2016–29 January 2020) and pandemic (30 January 2020–31 December 2021). (DOCX)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Figshare
- Published
- 2025-01-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316258.s013
- Primary Topic
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00