Details of the power analysis.

<div><p>Background</p><p>Chronic conditions are a significant public health concern due to their rising prevalence, association with high mortality, and substantial healthcare costs. General practitioners play a crucial role in managing these conditions, and quality indicators are essential tools for assessing the quality of care. Electronic feedback reports incorporating quality indicator performance have shown promise in improving care quality. However, most studies have focused on single conditions or link feedback to financial incentives, which may not sustain long-term practice changes. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-condition electronic feedback reports on quality indicator performance in Swiss general practice without financial incentives.</p><p>Methods</p><p>This randomized controlled trial involves general practitioners enrolled in the FIRE project, a database of electronic medical records from Swiss primary care. Participants are randomized to receive either a plain feedback report or a comprehensive quality indicator -specific feedback report bi-monthly for 12 months. The plain feedback report contains descriptive summaries of practice activities, while the quality indicator-specific feedback report includes performance data on 14 quality indicators across cardiovascular, endocrine, pulmonary, and renal domains. The quality indicators were selected in multi-step process involving review of the literature and clinical guidelines, domain expert consultations, and a panel discussion with general practitioners. The primary study objective is to compare the effectiveness of the quality indicator-specific feedback report and of the plain feedback report with respect to the performance of the selected quality indicators.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The study addresses a critical gap by evaluating a multi-condition feedback report without financial incentives. Its findings can inform future health policies and strategies, in line with national and international initiatives that promote or even require the implementation of quality measurement activities in general practice.</p><p>Trial registration</p><p>Trial registry: ISRCTN. Registration number: <a href="https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN37733900" target="_blank">ISRCTN10637092</a>, <a href="https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10637092" target="_blank">https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10637092</a>. Registered January 9, 2024.</p></div>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314360.s006
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Details of the power analysis.

Figshare
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

Details of the power analysis.

article en

Abstract

<div><p>Background</p><p>Chronic conditions are a significant public health concern due to their rising prevalence, association with high mortality, and substantial healthcare costs. General practitioners play a crucial role in managing these conditions, and quality indicators are essential tools for assessing the quality of care. Electronic feedback reports incorporating quality indicator performance have shown promise in improving care quality. However, most studies have focused on single conditions or link feedback to financial incentives, which may not sustain long-term practice changes. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-condition electronic feedback reports on quality indicator performance in Swiss general practice without financial incentives.</p><p>Methods</p><p>This randomized controlled trial involves general practitioners enrolled in the FIRE project, a database of electronic medical records from Swiss primary care. Participants are randomized to receive either a plain feedback report or a comprehensive quality indicator -specific feedback report bi-monthly for 12 months. The plain feedback report contains descriptive summaries of practice activities, while the quality indicator-specific feedback report includes performance data on 14 quality indicators across cardiovascular, endocrine, pulmonary, and renal domains. The quality indicators were selected in multi-step process involving review of the literature and clinical guidelines, domain expert consultations, and a panel discussion with general practitioners. The primary study objective is to compare the effectiveness of the quality indicator-specific feedback report and of the plain feedback report with respect to the performance of the selected quality indicators.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The study addresses a critical gap by evaluating a multi-condition feedback report without financial incentives. Its findings can inform future health policies and strategies, in line with national and international initiatives that promote or even require the implementation of quality measurement activities in general practice.</p><p>Trial registration</p><p>Trial registry: ISRCTN. Registration number: <a href="https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN37733900" target="_blank">ISRCTN10637092</a>, <a href="https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10637092" target="_blank">https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10637092</a>. Registered January 9, 2024.</p></div>

Figshare
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Details of the power analysis. · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS