List of excluded studies with reasons.

<div><p>Objective</p><p>In Europe, the age indication for the MF59-adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine (aQIV) has recently been extended from ≥65 to ≥50 years. Considering that the earliest approval of its trivalent formulation (aTIV) in Italy was for people aged ≥12 years, we aimed to systematically appraise data on the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of aTIV/aQIV in non-elderly adults.</p><p>Methods</p><p>A systematic literature review was conducted according to the available guidelines and studies were searched in MEDLINE, Biological Abstracts, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and clinical trial registries. Studies on absolute and relative immunogenicity, efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of aTIV/aQIV in non-elderly adults (<65 years) were potentially eligible. These endpoints were analyzed by virus (sub)types and characteristics of vaccinees. Fixed- and random-effects meta-analyses were performed for data synthesis. Protocol registration: CRD42024512472.</p><p>Results</p><p>Twenty-four publications were analyzed. aTIV/aQIV was more immunogenic than non-adjuvanted vaccines towards vaccine-like strains: the absolute differences in seroconversion rates were 8.8% (95% CI: 3.7%, 14.0%), 13.1% (95% CI: 6.7%, 19.6%) and 11.7% (95% CI: 7.2%, 16.2%) for A(H1N1), A(H3N2), and B strains, respectively. This immunogenicity advantage was more pronounced in immunosuppressed adults. Additionally, aTIV/aQIV was more immunogenic than non-adjuvanted counterparts towards heterologous A(H3N2) strains with a 10.7% (95% CI: 3.2%, 18.2%) difference in seroconversion rates. Data on antibody persistence and efficacy were limited and inconclusive. Overall, aTIV/aQIV was judged safe and well tolerated, although reactogenic events were more frequent in aTIV/aQIV recipients versus comparators. Serious adverse events were uncommon and no difference (risk ratio 1.02; 95% CI: 0.64, 1.63) between aTIV/aQIV and non-adjuvanted formulations was found.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>In non-elderly adults, aTIV/aQIV is safe and generally more immunogenic than non-adjuvanted standard-dose vaccines.</p></div>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310677.s049
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

List of excluded studies with reasons.

Figshare
Influenza Virus Research Studies
article

List of excluded studies with reasons.

article en

Abstract

<div><p>Objective</p><p>In Europe, the age indication for the MF59-adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine (aQIV) has recently been extended from ≥65 to ≥50 years. Considering that the earliest approval of its trivalent formulation (aTIV) in Italy was for people aged ≥12 years, we aimed to systematically appraise data on the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of aTIV/aQIV in non-elderly adults.</p><p>Methods</p><p>A systematic literature review was conducted according to the available guidelines and studies were searched in MEDLINE, Biological Abstracts, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and clinical trial registries. Studies on absolute and relative immunogenicity, efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of aTIV/aQIV in non-elderly adults (<65 years) were potentially eligible. These endpoints were analyzed by virus (sub)types and characteristics of vaccinees. Fixed- and random-effects meta-analyses were performed for data synthesis. Protocol registration: CRD42024512472.</p><p>Results</p><p>Twenty-four publications were analyzed. aTIV/aQIV was more immunogenic than non-adjuvanted vaccines towards vaccine-like strains: the absolute differences in seroconversion rates were 8.8% (95% CI: 3.7%, 14.0%), 13.1% (95% CI: 6.7%, 19.6%) and 11.7% (95% CI: 7.2%, 16.2%) for A(H1N1), A(H3N2), and B strains, respectively. This immunogenicity advantage was more pronounced in immunosuppressed adults. Additionally, aTIV/aQIV was more immunogenic than non-adjuvanted counterparts towards heterologous A(H3N2) strains with a 10.7% (95% CI: 3.2%, 18.2%) difference in seroconversion rates. Data on antibody persistence and efficacy were limited and inconclusive. Overall, aTIV/aQIV was judged safe and well tolerated, although reactogenic events were more frequent in aTIV/aQIV recipients versus comparators. Serious adverse events were uncommon and no difference (risk ratio 1.02; 95% CI: 0.64, 1.63) between aTIV/aQIV and non-adjuvanted formulations was found.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>In non-elderly adults, aTIV/aQIV is safe and generally more immunogenic than non-adjuvanted standard-dose vaccines.</p></div>

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.