A clinical analysis of three methods for repairing deciduous molars

Objective To discuss the efficacy of direct resin filling restoration, improved atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), and Hall technique in treating deciduous molars in children. Methods A total of 120 children with 180 deciduous molars who came to the Department of Oral Surgery of our hospital from January 2023 to August 2023 were selected and randomly divided into three groups: direct resin filling restoration group(40 people, 60 teeth), improved ataumatic restorative treatment group(40 people, 62 teeth), and Hall technique group(40 people, 58 teeth). The behavioral performance classification and degree of anxiety of the children during the treatment process and the treatment time were compared among the three groups. The clinical efficacy after 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months of treatment was compared and the reasons for failure were analyzed. Results The treatment time of the Hall technique group was significantly shorter than that of the improved ART group and direct filling group, and the differences in treatment time of the three groups had statistical significance(P<0.05). The Hall technique and improved ART technique were more easily accepted by the children, and the degree of anxiety and behavioral performance classification of the three groups had statistically significant differences(P<0.05). At the 12-month follow-up, the success rate of the direct filling restoration group was significantly different from that of the improved ART technique group and the Hall technique group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). However, the success rate of the improved ART technique group was not significantly different from that of the Hall technique group(P>0.05). Conclusion The success rate of the improved ART technique group and the Hall technique group is higher than that of the direct filling restoration group, and is more easily accepted by children. The pain level and degree of anxiety are lighter, and the treatment time of the Hall technique is shorter, which is more conducive to the repair of tooth decay.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2025.05.008
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A clinical analysis of three methods for repairing deciduous molars

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

A clinical analysis of three methods for repairing deciduous molars

article en

Abstract

Objective To discuss the efficacy of direct resin filling restoration, improved atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), and Hall technique in treating deciduous molars in children. Methods A total of 120 children with 180 deciduous molars who came to the Department of Oral Surgery of our hospital from January 2023 to August 2023 were selected and randomly divided into three groups: direct resin filling restoration group(40 people, 60 teeth), improved ataumatic restorative treatment group(40 people, 62 teeth), and Hall technique group(40 people, 58 teeth). The behavioral performance classification and degree of anxiety of the children during the treatment process and the treatment time were compared among the three groups. The clinical efficacy after 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months of treatment was compared and the reasons for failure were analyzed. Results The treatment time of the Hall technique group was significantly shorter than that of the improved ART group and direct filling group, and the differences in treatment time of the three groups had statistical significance(P<0.05). The Hall technique and improved ART technique were more easily accepted by the children, and the degree of anxiety and behavioral performance classification of the three groups had statistically significant differences(P<0.05). At the 12-month follow-up, the success rate of the direct filling restoration group was significantly different from that of the improved ART technique group and the Hall technique group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). However, the success rate of the improved ART technique group was not significantly different from that of the Hall technique group(P>0.05). Conclusion The success rate of the improved ART technique group and the Hall technique group is higher than that of the direct filling restoration group, and is more easily accepted by children. The pain level and degree of anxiety are lighter, and the treatment time of the Hall technique is shorter, which is more conducive to the repair of tooth decay.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Suzhou Municipal Hospital (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.