3R-conform models and GMP-grade GTMP production for highest quality in translationalresearch increasing welfare and safety for laboratory animals and patients

Non-human primates should be given granted basic rights; about this request decided a cantonal referendum (Basel) in 2022. In clinical practice, in 2024, a girl died from the adverse effects (AE) of a gene therapy trial, being not the first nor last but most recent tragedy in drug development (DD). How do these pieces of news fit together and what do they have to do with “good” research? The obligation for patient safety and the need for new therapies creates a conflict between human welfare and human rights with the rising request for regulations in animal welfare and animal rights. We are engaged in resolving the conflict by developing technologies that are both relevant for patient’s safety and efficacy and respect the rights of welfare for animals. Nowadays, DD involves 4 phases: Initial cell-based experiments, organoid or organ culture studies, animal testing, and clinical trials. While cell-based experiments yield rapid insights into a specific cell type, their lack of complexity and reliance on fetal bovine serum (FBS) present ethical and technical limitations. Organoids and organ cultures offer a higher level of complexity without the need for laboratory animals but face technical constraints and limited application. Animal testing allows for whole-organ analysis with all its interactions. It has, however, significant ethical concerns, limited translatability to humans, and regulatory requirements for testing in multiple species. Finally, a new drug is tested in patients including standardized, high-quality control (QC). Yet, this is difficult to implement particularly in Advanced Therapies, where risk-based QCs are established that cannot be standardized and are intended to minimize risks for severe unexpected AE but cannot exclude them. There are thus still major challenges to be met in DD. We develop therapies for the treatment of neuroretinal degeneration and conduct experiments in all the phases mentioned, through ethical practices aimed at patient safety. Three projects illustrate this commitment. First, we are establishing an FBS-free cell culture and are optimizing ex vivo retinal experiments to eliminate technical limitations, strengthen the significance and reduce reliance on animal experiments. Second, we have developed an improved age-related macular degeneration (AMD) model in 18-month-old mice. Third, we have established a transferable and standardized QC system for an AMD gene therapy. Together, these advancements align patient safety with ethical research principles and offer our patients innovative therapies that they can trust from the first cell experiment through clinical application.

Publication Details

Journal
Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13097/archive-ouverte/unige:185728
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3R-conform models and GMP-grade GTMP production for highest quality in translationalresearch increasing welfare and safety for laboratory animals and patients

Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva)
Animal testing and alternatives
article

3R-conform models and GMP-grade GTMP production for highest quality in translationalresearch increasing welfare and safety for laboratory animals and patients

article en

Abstract

Non-human primates should be given granted basic rights; about this request decided a cantonal referendum (Basel) in 2022. In clinical practice, in 2024, a girl died from the adverse effects (AE) of a gene therapy trial, being not the first nor last but most recent tragedy in drug development (DD). How do these pieces of news fit together and what do they have to do with “good” research? The obligation for patient safety and the need for new therapies creates a conflict between human welfare and human rights with the rising request for regulations in animal welfare and animal rights. We are engaged in resolving the conflict by developing technologies that are both relevant for patient’s safety and efficacy and respect the rights of welfare for animals. Nowadays, DD involves 4 phases: Initial cell-based experiments, organoid or organ culture studies, animal testing, and clinical trials. While cell-based experiments yield rapid insights into a specific cell type, their lack of complexity and reliance on fetal bovine serum (FBS) present ethical and technical limitations. Organoids and organ cultures offer a higher level of complexity without the need for laboratory animals but face technical constraints and limited application. Animal testing allows for whole-organ analysis with all its interactions. It has, however, significant ethical concerns, limited translatability to humans, and regulatory requirements for testing in multiple species. Finally, a new drug is tested in patients including standardized, high-quality control (QC). Yet, this is difficult to implement particularly in Advanced Therapies, where risk-based QCs are established that cannot be standardized and are intended to minimize risks for severe unexpected AE but cannot exclude them. There are thus still major challenges to be met in DD. We develop therapies for the treatment of neuroretinal degeneration and conduct experiments in all the phases mentioned, through ethical practices aimed at patient safety. Three projects illustrate this commitment. First, we are establishing an FBS-free cell culture and are optimizing ex vivo retinal experiments to eliminate technical limitations, strengthen the significance and reduce reliance on animal experiments. Second, we have developed an improved age-related macular degeneration (AMD) model in 18-month-old mice. Third, we have established a transferable and standardized QC system for an AMD gene therapy. Together, these advancements align patient safety with ethical research principles and offer our patients innovative therapies that they can trust from the first cell experiment through clinical application.

Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva)
National Science Foundation, ARVO Foundation for Eye Research, European Commission, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Université de Genève, RWTH Aachen University
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.