The Personal Is Not Yet Political nor Juridical for Women Seeking Asylum in the European Union. Critical Issues Arising from the CJEU Judgment of 16 January 2024, C-621/21

This note critically examines a recent judgment by the European Court of Justice regarding the recognition of gender-based violence as a ground for asylum for women. The analysis begins with a discussion on the neglect of international legal feminism in refugee law and highlights the importance of considering the binding provisions of the CEDAW and the Istanbul Convention. The judgment acknowledges women facing gender-based violence as members of a particular social group eligible for refugee status, but it falls short in recognizing the political dimension of their persecution. Additionally, it addresses the issue of non-state actors as perpetrators of persecution and emphasizes the need for detailed assessments considering various factors.

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Roma Tre
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13134/2704-9043/2-2024/4
Primary Topic
Discrimination and Equality Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Personal Is Not Yet Political nor Juridical for Women Seeking Asylum in the European Union. Critical Issues Arising from the CJEU Judgment of 16 January 2024, C-621/21

Università degli Studi di Roma Tre
Discrimination and Equality Law
article

The Personal Is Not Yet Political nor Juridical for Women Seeking Asylum in the European Union. Critical Issues Arising from the CJEU Judgment of 16 January 2024, C-621/21

article en

Abstract

This note critically examines a recent judgment by the European Court of Justice regarding the recognition of gender-based violence as a ground for asylum for women. The analysis begins with a discussion on the neglect of international legal feminism in refugee law and highlights the importance of considering the binding provisions of the CEDAW and the Istanbul Convention. The judgment acknowledges women facing gender-based violence as members of a particular social group eligible for refugee status, but it falls short in recognizing the political dimension of their persecution. Additionally, it addresses the issue of non-state actors as perpetrators of persecution and emphasizes the need for detailed assessments considering various factors.

Università degli Studi di Roma Tre
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Discrimination and Equality Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.