Analyzing and Comparing Mineral Identification Methods and their Applications

Mineral identification is a fundamental aspect of mineralogy. Traditional identification methods involved analyzing physical and observable properties, but more advanced methods, such as petrographic microscopy and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, can be used to measure optical and geochemical characteristics. Thirteen hand samples from Ward’s Laboratory Rock and Mineral Set were observed for physical characteristics (hardness, streak, crystal habit, luster, color, cleavage, and fracture) and scanned in an XRF spectrometer to generate graphs of their elemental composition. Seven thin sections were observed with a petrographic microscope and photographed using a digital camera. The results for each method were combined into a comprehensive dataset of each mineral. Each method provided a distinctive analysis of mineral characteristics and should be used to supplement each other for a more well-rounded dataset. Implementing a combination of these methods into educational settings, such as undergraduate laboratory exercises, would allow students to gain more understanding and experience with optical mineralogy and geochemistry.

Publication Details

Journal
Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13016/m2c6po-d9zo
Primary Topic
Mineral Processing and Grinding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing and Comparing Mineral Identification Methods and their Applications

Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
Mineral Processing and Grinding
article

Analyzing and Comparing Mineral Identification Methods and their Applications

article en

Abstract

Mineral identification is a fundamental aspect of mineralogy. Traditional identification methods involved analyzing physical and observable properties, but more advanced methods, such as petrographic microscopy and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, can be used to measure optical and geochemical characteristics. Thirteen hand samples from Ward’s Laboratory Rock and Mineral Set were observed for physical characteristics (hardness, streak, crystal habit, luster, color, cleavage, and fracture) and scanned in an XRF spectrometer to generate graphs of their elemental composition. Seven thin sections were observed with a petrographic microscope and photographed using a digital camera. The results for each method were combined into a comprehensive dataset of each mineral. Each method provided a distinctive analysis of mineral characteristics and should be used to supplement each other for a more well-rounded dataset. Implementing a combination of these methods into educational settings, such as undergraduate laboratory exercises, would allow students to gain more understanding and experience with optical mineralogy and geochemistry.

Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Mineral Processing and Grinding
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.