Effect of habitat type on the structure of ant forage areas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

The purpose of this paper is to study the structure of ant forage areas in urban habitats, semi-urban habitats and natural habitats. The study was conducted in the Ukrainian regions of Crimea (2012 to 2013) and Kyiv and its suburbs (2015 to 2018, 2021 to 2023). We examined 1321 forage trees and 849 colonies of 9 ant species in Kyiv and suburbs; and 413 trees and 141 colonies of 2 ant species in Crimea. The methods we used included transect examination of the trees with ants along a 10 m wide strip, measuring tree sizes (trunk girth) and recording ant species and numbers. Most ant species show a negative relationship between distance from the tree and the number of workers, indicating that the farther from the tree, the less is the number of ants. In natural habitats, higher numbers of ants and greater distances to forage trees are observed compared with urban or semi-urban habitats. Quercus robur, Pinus sylvestris and Acer platanoides were the most visited trees with a total visit frequency of 0.86 of the total number of records. In urban habitats, Lasius niger and Lasius emarginatus controlled an average of one tree each, and Crematogaster subdentata controlled an average of 5.8 trees. In urban habitats (Kyiv and suburbs), more common were colonies of two ant species (L. niger, Formica cinerea). There was no significant correlation between the distance from the nest to the forage tree and the tree size. Ants show different dispersal strategies in different habitat types. In urban habitats, ants settle closer to forage trees and control fewer trees due to limited food resources.

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli studi di Roma La Sapienza
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13133/2284-4880/1612
Primary Topic
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of habitat type on the structure of ant forage areas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Università degli studi di Roma La Sapienza
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
article

Effect of habitat type on the structure of ant forage areas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

article en

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to study the structure of ant forage areas in urban habitats, semi-urban habitats and natural habitats. The study was conducted in the Ukrainian regions of Crimea (2012 to 2013) and Kyiv and its suburbs (2015 to 2018, 2021 to 2023). We examined 1321 forage trees and 849 colonies of 9 ant species in Kyiv and suburbs; and 413 trees and 141 colonies of 2 ant species in Crimea. The methods we used included transect examination of the trees with ants along a 10 m wide strip, measuring tree sizes (trunk girth) and recording ant species and numbers. Most ant species show a negative relationship between distance from the tree and the number of workers, indicating that the farther from the tree, the less is the number of ants. In natural habitats, higher numbers of ants and greater distances to forage trees are observed compared with urban or semi-urban habitats. Quercus robur, Pinus sylvestris and Acer platanoides were the most visited trees with a total visit frequency of 0.86 of the total number of records. In urban habitats, Lasius niger and Lasius emarginatus controlled an average of one tree each, and Crematogaster subdentata controlled an average of 5.8 trees. In urban habitats (Kyiv and suburbs), more common were colonies of two ant species (L. niger, Formica cinerea). There was no significant correlation between the distance from the nest to the forage tree and the tree size. Ants show different dispersal strategies in different habitat types. In urban habitats, ants settle closer to forage trees and control fewer trees due to limited food resources.

Università degli studi di Roma La Sapienza
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.