Effect of different pretreatment methods on the quality of fermented mustard

In order to optimize the production process of fermented mustard, the effects of different pretreatment methods of fresh mustard on physicochemical indexes, color parameters, texture, volatile flavor components, and sensory quality of fermented mustard were investigated. Principal component analysis (PCA), orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) and cluster analysis (CA) were performed based on texture, volatile flavor components, and differential volatile flavor components were screened using variable importance in the projection (VIP) values. The results showed that the optimal pre-treatment method for fresh mustard: soaked it in 4% saline for 2 h, then dried the surface moisture naturally (dried 8 h, moisture 83.3%). The total acid and amino acid nitrogen contents of the naturally fermented mustard product were 19.98 g/kg and 0.28 g/100 g, and the L* value, a* value, b* value, and color difference value were 36.07, -0.27, 4.70, 4.21, respectively. The comprehensive texture score was 1.71 points, and the sensory score was 92 points. The nitrite content was 0.014 3 mg/kg, which was much lower than the national limit standard (20 mg/kg). A total of 74 volatile flavor components in fermented mustard samples with different pretreatments were detected, including 15 alcohols, 1 phenol, 2 ketones, 12 aldehydes, 3 nitriles, 7 esters, 4 isothiocyanates, 29 hydrocarbons, and 1 other type. OPLS-DA could effectively distinguish fermented mustard samples with different pretreatments, and a total of 45 differentially volatile flavor components (VIP values>1) were screened.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2025.03.024
Primary Topic
Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of different pretreatment methods on the quality of fermented mustard

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
article

Effect of different pretreatment methods on the quality of fermented mustard

article en

Abstract

In order to optimize the production process of fermented mustard, the effects of different pretreatment methods of fresh mustard on physicochemical indexes, color parameters, texture, volatile flavor components, and sensory quality of fermented mustard were investigated. Principal component analysis (PCA), orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) and cluster analysis (CA) were performed based on texture, volatile flavor components, and differential volatile flavor components were screened using variable importance in the projection (VIP) values. The results showed that the optimal pre-treatment method for fresh mustard: soaked it in 4% saline for 2 h, then dried the surface moisture naturally (dried 8 h, moisture 83.3%). The total acid and amino acid nitrogen contents of the naturally fermented mustard product were 19.98 g/kg and 0.28 g/100 g, and the L* value, a* value, b* value, and color difference value were 36.07, -0.27, 4.70, 4.21, respectively. The comprehensive texture score was 1.71 points, and the sensory score was 92 points. The nitrite content was 0.014 3 mg/kg, which was much lower than the national limit standard (20 mg/kg). A total of 74 volatile flavor components in fermented mustard samples with different pretreatments were detected, including 15 alcohols, 1 phenol, 2 ketones, 12 aldehydes, 3 nitriles, 7 esters, 4 isothiocyanates, 29 hydrocarbons, and 1 other type. OPLS-DA could effectively distinguish fermented mustard samples with different pretreatments, and a total of 45 differentially volatile flavor components (VIP values>1) were screened.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Hunan Agricultural University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.