Revisiting reproducibility in transportation simulation studies

Abstract Most transportation publications to date lack sufficient transparency in terms of open source and data, in order to enable reproducibility. This work sets out to highlight the need for reproducibility of computational simulation studies, and to develop the level of professionality in the transportation domain when it comes to open source. Moreover, this work aims to equip the readers with a guide on best practices inspired by the computer science domain, templates for documentation of software and data, and guidelines on repository management and open source. The empirical analysis of more than 11,879 simulation studies and 672 repositories in the field reveals that only few works (less than 2%) share supplementary material alongside the scientific publication, on a mostly mediocre repository quality, but with a strong trend towards more transparency in the last years. Besides, simulation studies with enhanced transparency are found to not receive significantly more citations when compared with studies that do not provide additional repositories. What’s more, a survey of more than 87 transportation researchers conveys that reproducibility is perceived as a significant issue by the community, and that time and legal constraints are the largest impediments to more reproducible research.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Transport Research Review
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-025-00718-9
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting reproducibility in transportation simulation studies

6 citations
European Transport Research Review
Scientific Computing and Data Management
25.01
article

Revisiting reproducibility in transportation simulation studies

article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Most transportation publications to date lack sufficient transparency in terms of open source and data, in order to enable reproducibility. This work sets out to highlight the need for reproducibility of computational simulation studies, and to develop the level of professionality in the transportation domain when it comes to open source. Moreover, this work aims to equip the readers with a guide on best practices inspired by the computer science domain, templates for documentation of software and data, and guidelines on repository management and open source. The empirical analysis of more than 11,879 simulation studies and 672 repositories in the field reveals that only few works (less than 2%) share supplementary material alongside the scientific publication, on a mostly mediocre repository quality, but with a strong trend towards more transparency in the last years. Besides, simulation studies with enhanced transparency are found to not receive significantly more citations when compared with studies that do not provide additional repositories. What’s more, a survey of more than 87 transportation researchers conveys that reproducibility is perceived as a significant issue by the community, and that time and legal constraints are the largest impediments to more reproducible research.

European Transport Research ReviewVol. 17(1)
ETH Zurich (CH)
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
25.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.