Ethical Review Challenges and Strategies in Cross-institutional and Interdisciplinary Collaborative Research Projects

This study aims to discuss the new challenges posed by ethical review of scientific research activities. It systematically reviews relevant regulations concerning the ethical oversight of collaborative projects and draws on international advanced experiences. Based on current practice, the paper analyzes key issues, including ethical value conflicts across disciplines and institutions, uneven development of ethical review capacities, lack of detailed ethical guidelines for cutting-edge technologies, and unclear processes and responsibilities in institutional ethical reviews. The existing review criteria, models, quality, and efficiency of reviews all need improvement. The study proposes suggestions for ethical review models tailored to collaborative research, emphasizing that effective ethical oversight in cross-institutional and interdisciplinary projects depends on coordinated governance among stakeholders. Key strategies include strengthening ethical guidelines, enhancing internal institutional governance, improving inter-institutional coordination, and increasing government support.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2025.10.06
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Review Challenges and Strategies in Cross-institutional and Interdisciplinary Collaborative Research Projects

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Ethical Review Challenges and Strategies in Cross-institutional and Interdisciplinary Collaborative Research Projects

article en

Abstract

This study aims to discuss the new challenges posed by ethical review of scientific research activities. It systematically reviews relevant regulations concerning the ethical oversight of collaborative projects and draws on international advanced experiences. Based on current practice, the paper analyzes key issues, including ethical value conflicts across disciplines and institutions, uneven development of ethical review capacities, lack of detailed ethical guidelines for cutting-edge technologies, and unclear processes and responsibilities in institutional ethical reviews. The existing review criteria, models, quality, and efficiency of reviews all need improvement. The study proposes suggestions for ethical review models tailored to collaborative research, emphasizing that effective ethical oversight in cross-institutional and interdisciplinary projects depends on coordinated governance among stakeholders. Key strategies include strengthening ethical guidelines, enhancing internal institutional governance, improving inter-institutional coordination, and increasing government support.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Guangzhou First People's Hospital (CN), Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (CN), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ethical Review Challenges and Strategies in Cross-institutional and Interdisciplinary Collaborative Research Projects · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS