Research on Evaluation Indicators for Humanistic Ward Rounds in Hospice Care Institutions

Firstly, based on literature research and a Delphi consultation, the opinions of 15 domestic experts in the field of hospice care services were summarized and sorted out. The evaluation indicators for humanistic ward rounds in hospice care service institutions were constructed, consisting of 4 primary indicators, 13 secondary indicators, and 22 tertiary indicators, with an expert consistency coefficient of 0.654 (P<0.05). Secondly, a survey was conducted on 120 hospice care service personnel from 13 institutions conducting humanistic ward rounds to evaluate the feasibility of the indicator system. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for 22 indicators was 0.820, and the Guttman halving coefficient was 0.844. The CVI values for all tertiary indicators exceeded 0.78. The evaluation indicator system demonstrated good reliability, validity, and feasibility, providing a solid foundation for further designing specific evaluation tools and promoting standardized implementation of humanistic ward rounds in hospice care.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2025.01.08
Primary Topic
Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Evaluation Indicators for Humanistic Ward Rounds in Hospice Care Institutions

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
article

Research on Evaluation Indicators for Humanistic Ward Rounds in Hospice Care Institutions

article en

Abstract

Firstly, based on literature research and a Delphi consultation, the opinions of 15 domestic experts in the field of hospice care services were summarized and sorted out. The evaluation indicators for humanistic ward rounds in hospice care service institutions were constructed, consisting of 4 primary indicators, 13 secondary indicators, and 22 tertiary indicators, with an expert consistency coefficient of 0.654 (P<0.05). Secondly, a survey was conducted on 120 hospice care service personnel from 13 institutions conducting humanistic ward rounds to evaluate the feasibility of the indicator system. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for 22 indicators was 0.820, and the Guttman halving coefficient was 0.844. The CVI values for all tertiary indicators exceeded 0.78. The evaluation indicator system demonstrated good reliability, validity, and feasibility, providing a solid foundation for further designing specific evaluation tools and promoting standardized implementation of humanistic ward rounds in hospice care.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Shanghai Changzheng Hospital (CN), Shanghai Hospital Development Center (CN), Central Hospital of Putuo District (CN), Community Health Center (US), Hospice UK (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research on Evaluation Indicators for Humanistic Ward Rounds in Hospice Care Institutions · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS