Ethical Dilemmas and Coping Strategies in the Use of Psychological Scales in the Era of Big Data

Focusing on the ethical risks arising from the reconstruction of psychological scales due to innovations in big data technology, a systematic analysis is conducted on the research and current use of psychological scales within the context of big data. Ethical issues are explored across five dimensions: data privacy and security, the effectiveness of informed consent, data bias and algorithmic worship, sociocultural sensitivity, and the marginalization of vulnerable groups' rights. In response, five strategies are proposed: establishing a comprehensive data lifecycle protection mechanism, innovating informed consent models, optimizing algorithm fairness assessments, constructing diverse datasets, and empowering vulnerable groups. Future research and practice must seek a balance between technological innovation and ethical safeguards to ensure the fairness, transparency, and sustainable development of psychological scales in the era of big data.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2025.07.11
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Dilemmas and Coping Strategies in the Use of Psychological Scales in the Era of Big Data

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Ethical Dilemmas and Coping Strategies in the Use of Psychological Scales in the Era of Big Data

article en

Abstract

Focusing on the ethical risks arising from the reconstruction of psychological scales due to innovations in big data technology, a systematic analysis is conducted on the research and current use of psychological scales within the context of big data. Ethical issues are explored across five dimensions: data privacy and security, the effectiveness of informed consent, data bias and algorithmic worship, sociocultural sensitivity, and the marginalization of vulnerable groups' rights. In response, five strategies are proposed: establishing a comprehensive data lifecycle protection mechanism, innovating informed consent models, optimizing algorithm fairness assessments, constructing diverse datasets, and empowering vulnerable groups. Future research and practice must seek a balance between technological innovation and ethical safeguards to ensure the fairness, transparency, and sustainable development of psychological scales in the era of big data.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Gannan Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.