Transfer Learning for Dysphagia Detection

This study evaluates the use of transfer learning techniques to differentiate normal and pathological swallowing sounds. Audio data were obtained by recording swallow sounds from healthy participants and patients with dysphagia using a commercially available wearable stethoscope. In our previous study which used a traditional approach, statistically significant differences were found in acoustic features such as spectral crest and zero-crossing rate, between normal and dysphagic swallows. Random forest modelling resulted in fair sensitivity (mean ± SD: 74% ± 8%) and specificity (89% ± 6%) for dysphagic swallows, with an overall accuracy of 83% ± 3% and an F1 score of 78% ± 5%. To explore whether a deep learning approach would improve classification performance, transfer learning methods (Vggish, Yamnet, and OpenL3) were employed. These methods significantly outperformed the random forest model used in our previous study. Vggish achieved the highest metrics with 91.52% precision, 87.65% sensitivity, 93.70% specificity, 91.13% accuracy, and an F1 score of 89.38%. Yamnet (Precision: 90.80%, Sensitivity: 88.24% Specificity: 93.26%, Accuracy: 91.13%, F1 score: 89.25%) and OpenL3 (Precision: 87.68%, Sensitivity: 87.37% Specificity: 90.66%, Accuracy: 89.65%, F1 score: 87.35%) also showed superior performance with precision and accuracy metrics. Overall, these results demonstrate that cross-domain transfer learning approaches can be valuable tools in enhancing the accuracy and reliability of dysphagia detection, and the need for further research to optimize these techniques for clinical use.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tencon61640.2024.10903053
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transfer Learning for Dysphagia Detection

Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Transfer Learning for Dysphagia Detection

article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the use of transfer learning techniques to differentiate normal and pathological swallowing sounds. Audio data were obtained by recording swallow sounds from healthy participants and patients with dysphagia using a commercially available wearable stethoscope. In our previous study which used a traditional approach, statistically significant differences were found in acoustic features such as spectral crest and zero-crossing rate, between normal and dysphagic swallows. Random forest modelling resulted in fair sensitivity (mean ± SD: 74% ± 8%) and specificity (89% ± 6%) for dysphagic swallows, with an overall accuracy of 83% ± 3% and an F1 score of 78% ± 5%. To explore whether a deep learning approach would improve classification performance, transfer learning methods (Vggish, Yamnet, and OpenL3) were employed. These methods significantly outperformed the random forest model used in our previous study. Vggish achieved the highest metrics with 91.52% precision, 87.65% sensitivity, 93.70% specificity, 91.13% accuracy, and an F1 score of 89.38%. Yamnet (Precision: 90.80%, Sensitivity: 88.24% Specificity: 93.26%, Accuracy: 91.13%, F1 score: 89.25%) and OpenL3 (Precision: 87.68%, Sensitivity: 87.37% Specificity: 90.66%, Accuracy: 89.65%, F1 score: 87.35%) also showed superior performance with precision and accuracy metrics. Overall, these results demonstrate that cross-domain transfer learning approaches can be valuable tools in enhancing the accuracy and reliability of dysphagia detection, and the need for further research to optimize these techniques for clinical use.

Ministry of Health (SG), Singapore University of Technology and Design (SG), Sengkang General Hospital (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.