Weak Belnapian modal logic

Abstract In this paper, a new modal logic extending the first-degree entailment (FDE) system is introduced. This system, called weak Belnapian modal logic (WBK), is closely related to two other modal logics: modal bilattice logic (MBL) and Belnapian modal logic (BK), both of which have some claims towards inducing an (in some sense) minimal semantic framework. In fact, two versions of WBK are provided: one in the language of BK and one in the language of MBL. Calling them versions of the same system is justified by the fact that both of them share the same modal axioms and rules and that the latter is a conservative extension of the former by some non-modal connectives. In this paper, we show that WBK gives rise to a semantic framework that is more general than those of MBL and BK while still retaining an intuitive interpretation. We provide an axiom system and semantics for our logic and prove a number of correspondence results, mainly showing how semantics of BK and MBL can be recovered from that of WBK. Finally, we make some remarks on the expressive power of the version of WBK over the language of MBL.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Logic and Computation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exaf022
Primary Topic
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weak Belnapian modal logic

Journal of Logic and Computation
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
article

Weak Belnapian modal logic

article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, a new modal logic extending the first-degree entailment (FDE) system is introduced. This system, called weak Belnapian modal logic (WBK), is closely related to two other modal logics: modal bilattice logic (MBL) and Belnapian modal logic (BK), both of which have some claims towards inducing an (in some sense) minimal semantic framework. In fact, two versions of WBK are provided: one in the language of BK and one in the language of MBL. Calling them versions of the same system is justified by the fact that both of them share the same modal axioms and rules and that the latter is a conservative extension of the former by some non-modal connectives. In this paper, we show that WBK gives rise to a semantic framework that is more general than those of MBL and BK while still retaining an intuitive interpretation. We provide an axiom system and semantics for our logic and prove a number of correspondence results, mainly showing how semantics of BK and MBL can be recovered from that of WBK. Finally, we make some remarks on the expressive power of the version of WBK over the language of MBL.

Journal of Logic and ComputationVol. 35(3)
Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Weak Belnapian modal logic · Journal of Logic and Computation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS