Impacts of e-commerce platform and consumers’ supporting preferences for poor areas in a supply chain

In this paper, we consider a poverty alleviation (PA) agricultural product supply chain with an e-commerce platform, a farmer in poor areas, and a farmer in other general areas, where the platform with corporate social responsibility and consumers both have supporting preferences for poor areas. We investigate the optimal strategies by further considering logistics cost difference between the poor areas and other areas. The results indicate that the platform and consumers’ supporting preferences are both beneficial to improve the poor farmer’s profit, while they may decrease the sales quantity and the price of general agricultural products. In addition, the high logistics cost of poor areas has negative impacts on the sales of PA agricultural products and the poor farmer’s profit. By virtue of some numerical analysis, we further discover that the platform’s profit improves with its supporting preference only when consumers’ supporting preference is relatively large, or when the platform and consumers’ supporting preferences are both relatively small. In addition, the consumer surplus always improves with supporting preference.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2024203/pdf
Primary Topic
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of e-commerce platform and consumers’ supporting preferences for poor areas in a supply chain

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
article

Impacts of e-commerce platform and consumers’ supporting preferences for poor areas in a supply chain

article en

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a poverty alleviation (PA) agricultural product supply chain with an e-commerce platform, a farmer in poor areas, and a farmer in other general areas, where the platform with corporate social responsibility and consumers both have supporting preferences for poor areas. We investigate the optimal strategies by further considering logistics cost difference between the poor areas and other areas. The results indicate that the platform and consumers’ supporting preferences are both beneficial to improve the poor farmer’s profit, while they may decrease the sales quantity and the price of general agricultural products. In addition, the high logistics cost of poor areas has negative impacts on the sales of PA agricultural products and the poor farmer’s profit. By virtue of some numerical analysis, we further discover that the platform’s profit improves with its supporting preference only when consumers’ supporting preference is relatively large, or when the platform and consumers’ supporting preferences are both relatively small. In addition, the consumer surplus always improves with supporting preference.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Government of Jiangsu Province, National Social Science Fund of China
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.