A requirements model for AI algorithms in functional safety-critical systems with an explainable self-enforcing network from a developer perspective

The requirements for ensuring functional safety have always been very high. Modern safety-related systems are becoming increasingly complex, making also the safety integrity assessment more complex and time-consuming. This trend is further intensified by the fact that AI-based algorithms are finding their way into safety-related systems or will do so in the future. However, existing and expected standards and regulations for the use of AI methods pose significant challenges for the development of embedded AI software in functional safety-related systems. The consideration of essential requirements from various perspectives necessitates an intensive examination of the subject matter, especially as different standards have to be taken into account depending on the final application. There are also different targets for the “safe behavior” of a system depending on the target application. While stopping all movements of a machine in industrial production plants is likely to be considered a “safe state”, the same condition might not be considered as safe in flying aircraft, driving cars or medicine equipment like heart pacemaker. This overall complexity is operationalized in our approach in such a way that it is straightforward to monitor conformity with the requirements. To support safety integrity assessments and reduce the required effort, a Self-Enforcing Network (SEN) model is presented in which developers or safety experts can indicate the degree of fulfillment of certain requirements with possible impact on the safety integrity of a safety-related system. The result evaluated by the SEN model indicates the achievable safety integrity level of the assessed system, which is additionally provided by an explanatory component.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/sands/2024020/pdf
Primary Topic
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A requirements model for AI algorithms in functional safety-critical systems with an explainable self-enforcing network from a developer perspective

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
article

A requirements model for AI algorithms in functional safety-critical systems with an explainable self-enforcing network from a developer perspective

article en

Abstract

The requirements for ensuring functional safety have always been very high. Modern safety-related systems are becoming increasingly complex, making also the safety integrity assessment more complex and time-consuming. This trend is further intensified by the fact that AI-based algorithms are finding their way into safety-related systems or will do so in the future. However, existing and expected standards and regulations for the use of AI methods pose significant challenges for the development of embedded AI software in functional safety-related systems. The consideration of essential requirements from various perspectives necessitates an intensive examination of the subject matter, especially as different standards have to be taken into account depending on the final application. There are also different targets for the “safe behavior” of a system depending on the target application. While stopping all movements of a machine in industrial production plants is likely to be considered a “safe state”, the same condition might not be considered as safe in flying aircraft, driving cars or medicine equipment like heart pacemaker. This overall complexity is operationalized in our approach in such a way that it is straightforward to monitor conformity with the requirements. To support safety integrity assessments and reduce the required effort, a Self-Enforcing Network (SEN) model is presented in which developers or safety experts can indicate the degree of fulfillment of certain requirements with possible impact on the safety integrity of a safety-related system. The result evaluated by the SEN model indicates the achievable safety integrity level of the assessed system, which is additionally provided by an explanatory component.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.