Connecting innovation and policy to reduce to carbon emissions from manufacturing

Drawing on qualitative case study data from Scottish distilleries and from UK cement production, this paper explores firmand sector-level responses to the net zero carbon emissions challenge, demonstrating the difference between two pathways: (1) improving existing technologies and processes, and (2) developing and adopting new technologies. For each pathway, our data shows that a distinctive mix of policy and regulation needs to be in place to achieve the desired transition. This holds true across both of our energy-intensive manufacturing cases.: whisky distillation and cement manufacture. For Pathway 1, innovation is passive in relation to policy; i.e. the pursuit of optimisation means that innovations respond to incentives (or disincentives) but do not create the conditions for policy success. For pathway 2, innovation and policy feed off each other in a more dynamic relationship; pushing each other and establishing conditions that support transformative practices and technology-process development. Effective policy mixes must also reflect aspects of place that affect the firm, whether cultural, resource factors, social norms, or governance and political arrangements.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-06-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562903001/pdf
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Connecting innovation and policy to reduce to carbon emissions from manufacturing

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Connecting innovation and policy to reduce to carbon emissions from manufacturing

article en

Abstract

Drawing on qualitative case study data from Scottish distilleries and from UK cement production, this paper explores firmand sector-level responses to the net zero carbon emissions challenge, demonstrating the difference between two pathways: (1) improving existing technologies and processes, and (2) developing and adopting new technologies. For each pathway, our data shows that a distinctive mix of policy and regulation needs to be in place to achieve the desired transition. This holds true across both of our energy-intensive manufacturing cases.: whisky distillation and cement manufacture. For Pathway 1, innovation is passive in relation to policy; i.e. the pursuit of optimisation means that innovations respond to incentives (or disincentives) but do not create the conditions for policy success. For pathway 2, innovation and policy feed off each other in a more dynamic relationship; pushing each other and establishing conditions that support transformative practices and technology-process development. Effective policy mixes must also reflect aspects of place that affect the firm, whether cultural, resource factors, social norms, or governance and political arrangements.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Connecting innovation and policy to reduce to carbon emissions from manufacturing · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS