Analysis of Damage in a Warren Truss Bridge Using CAE and DANN Neural Networks

\nBridges require constant monitoring to detect damages. This study analyzes the Japanese Warren truss bridge using neural networks: Convolutional Autoencoder (CAE) and Domain-Adversarial Neural Network (DANN). The methodology focuses on two aspects: reconstruction of bridge acceleration data with CAE and damage analysis with DANN using CAE-processed data. CAE is trained to reconstruct acceleration data by recovering missing data and generating new data to improve dataset quality. Then, DANN uses this data to identify and evaluate anomalies in the bridge structure. The results obtained were 84% accuracy with respect to the synthetic data generated with the CAE network and 95% accuracy and an F1-score of 92% in the damage analysis of the bridge with the DANN network.\n

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202458602002/pdf
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Damage in a Warren Truss Bridge Using CAE and DANN Neural Networks

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
article

Analysis of Damage in a Warren Truss Bridge Using CAE and DANN Neural Networks

article en

Abstract

\nBridges require constant monitoring to detect damages. This study analyzes the Japanese Warren truss bridge using neural networks: Convolutional Autoencoder (CAE) and Domain-Adversarial Neural Network (DANN). The methodology focuses on two aspects: reconstruction of bridge acceleration data with CAE and damage analysis with DANN using CAE-processed data. CAE is trained to reconstruct acceleration data by recovering missing data and generating new data to improve dataset quality. Then, DANN uses this data to identify and evaluate anomalies in the bridge structure. The results obtained were 84% accuracy with respect to the synthetic data generated with the CAE network and 95% accuracy and an F1-score of 92% in the damage analysis of the bridge with the DANN network.\n

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.