Limitations of XGBoost in Predicting Material Parameters for Complex Constitutive Models

Machine learning models, particularly Extreme Gradient Boosting, have been explored for predicting material parameters in constitutive models that describe the plastic behaviour of metal sheets. While effective for simple constitutive models like Hill′48, their performance declines with more complex models such as the Cazacu-Plunckett-Barlat yield criterion. This study examines the influence of training dataset size and dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis on predictive accuracy. Results show that increasing the training dataset size leads to only marginal improvements, with testing coefficient of determination value plateauing at about 0.50, despite a consistently high training value of about 0.99999, indicating overfitting. Similarly, applying principal component analysis to the baseline model provided no significant enhancement. These findings suggest that simply expanding the dataset or reducing dimensionality is insufficient to address the complexities of CPB′06. Instead, alternative approaches such as advanced feature selection, hybrid ML-physics-based models, or regularization techniques may be required to improve generalization. Future work should explore methods integrating domain knowledge and physics-based modelling to enhance predictive accuracy for complex constitutive models.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202540801023/pdf
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Limitations of XGBoost in Predicting Material Parameters for Complex Constitutive Models

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Limitations of XGBoost in Predicting Material Parameters for Complex Constitutive Models

article en

Abstract

Machine learning models, particularly Extreme Gradient Boosting, have been explored for predicting material parameters in constitutive models that describe the plastic behaviour of metal sheets. While effective for simple constitutive models like Hill′48, their performance declines with more complex models such as the Cazacu-Plunckett-Barlat yield criterion. This study examines the influence of training dataset size and dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis on predictive accuracy. Results show that increasing the training dataset size leads to only marginal improvements, with testing coefficient of determination value plateauing at about 0.50, despite a consistently high training value of about 0.99999, indicating overfitting. Similarly, applying principal component analysis to the baseline model provided no significant enhancement. These findings suggest that simply expanding the dataset or reducing dimensionality is insufficient to address the complexities of CPB′06. Instead, alternative approaches such as advanced feature selection, hybrid ML-physics-based models, or regularization techniques may be required to improve generalization. Future work should explore methods integrating domain knowledge and physics-based modelling to enhance predictive accuracy for complex constitutive models.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Limitations of XGBoost in Predicting Material Parameters for Complex Constitutive Models · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS