Polarisation results from the GOODS-N field with Apertif and polarised source counts

We analysed six Apertif datasets, covering the GOODS-N LOFAR deep field region, aiming to improve our understanding of the faint radio source composition, their polarisation behaviour, and how this affects our interpretation of polarised source counts. Using a semi-automatic routine, we ran rotation measure synthesis to generate a polarised intensity mosaic for each observation. The routine also performs source finding and cross-matching with the total power catalogue, as well as NVSS, SDSS and allWISE, to obtain a catalogue of 1182 polarised sources in an area of 47.4\\,deg$^2$. Using the mid-infrared (MIR) radio correlation, we found no indication of any polarised emission from star formation. To robustly estimate the source counts, we performed an investigation of our sample's completeness as a function of the polarised flux via synthetic source injection. In contrast to previous works, we find no strong dependency of fractional polarisation on the total intensity flux density. We argue that differences regarding previous (small-scale, deep field) analyses can be attributed to sample variance. Relative to the findings of previous works, here we find a steeper slope for our Euclidean-normalised differential source counts. This is also visible as a flattening in cumulative source counts. We attribute the observed steeper slope in Euclidean normalised differential source counts to a change in the source composition and properties at low total intensities.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245733/pdf
Primary Topic
Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polarisation results from the GOODS-N field with Apertif and polarised source counts

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
article

Polarisation results from the GOODS-N field with Apertif and polarised source counts

article en

Abstract

We analysed six Apertif datasets, covering the GOODS-N LOFAR deep field region, aiming to improve our understanding of the faint radio source composition, their polarisation behaviour, and how this affects our interpretation of polarised source counts. Using a semi-automatic routine, we ran rotation measure synthesis to generate a polarised intensity mosaic for each observation. The routine also performs source finding and cross-matching with the total power catalogue, as well as NVSS, SDSS and allWISE, to obtain a catalogue of 1182 polarised sources in an area of 47.4\\,deg$^2$. Using the mid-infrared (MIR) radio correlation, we found no indication of any polarised emission from star formation. To robustly estimate the source counts, we performed an investigation of our sample's completeness as a function of the polarised flux via synthetic source injection. In contrast to previous works, we find no strong dependency of fractional polarisation on the total intensity flux density. We argue that differences regarding previous (small-scale, deep field) analyses can be attributed to sample variance. Relative to the findings of previous works, here we find a steeper slope for our Euclidean-normalised differential source counts. This is also visible as a flattening in cumulative source counts. We attribute the observed steeper slope in Euclidean normalised differential source counts to a change in the source composition and properties at low total intensities.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.