Research on Optimization of Low-carbon Eco-city Indicator System in China from International Comparison Perspective

This paper, guided by the goals of “carbon peak” and “carbon neutrality,” examines the Low-carbon Eco-city index systems of developed countries through international comparison. It identifies key points for constructing China’s own index system under these goals and proposes a framework for optimizing China’s Low-carbon Eco-city system. A comparison is made between the China-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city Version 2.0 and Bristol’s urban development index, focusing on the index framework and specific data. The analysis highlights both similarities and differences. By drawing on Bristol’s approach, it suggests increasing the share of renewable energy, developing clean energy, green building materials, renewable energy technologies, and smart technologies, while improving energy efficiency, reducing emissions, and enhancing carbon sink capacity. Based on these findings, relevant strategies for optimizing China’s Low-carbon Eco-city index system are proposed.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562501013/pdf
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Optimization of Low-carbon Eco-city Indicator System in China from International Comparison Perspective

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Research on Optimization of Low-carbon Eco-city Indicator System in China from International Comparison Perspective

article en

Abstract

This paper, guided by the goals of “carbon peak” and “carbon neutrality,” examines the Low-carbon Eco-city index systems of developed countries through international comparison. It identifies key points for constructing China’s own index system under these goals and proposes a framework for optimizing China’s Low-carbon Eco-city system. A comparison is made between the China-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city Version 2.0 and Bristol’s urban development index, focusing on the index framework and specific data. The analysis highlights both similarities and differences. By drawing on Bristol’s approach, it suggests increasing the share of renewable energy, developing clean energy, green building materials, renewable energy technologies, and smart technologies, while improving energy efficiency, reducing emissions, and enhancing carbon sink capacity. Based on these findings, relevant strategies for optimizing China’s Low-carbon Eco-city index system are proposed.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.