Catalyst-Controlled\nChemoselective γ‑C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H Lactonization\nof Carboxylic Acid: Methyl versus\nMethylene

Despite\nrecent advances in ligand-enabled C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H\nfunctionalization of native substrates, controlling chemoselectivity\nin the presence of methyl and methylene C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H\nbonds remains a significant challenge. Herein, we report the first\nexample of the Pd(II)-catalyzed chemoselective lactonization of γ-methyl\nand methylene C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H bonds of carboxylic acids.\nExclusive chemoselectivity of methyl or methylene γ-lactonization\nwas achieved by using two different classes of Quinoline-Pyridone\nligands. The bidentate ligand coordinating with Pd(II) via five-membered\nchelation favors γ-methyl C–H lactonization, whereas\nthe ligand forming six-membered chelation affords γ-methylene\nC–H lactonization exclusively. Taking into account our previous\nfindings, we show that the impact of ligand bite angle on chemoselectivity\nis different for five-membered and six-membered cyclopalladation processes.\nThis method provides simple and versatile access to γ-lactones,\nincluding spiro- and fused ring systems. Deuterium incorporation experiments\nsuggest that this observed chemoselectivity arises from both the C–H\nactivation and C–O bond forming steps.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c12907.s001
Primary Topic
Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Catalyst-Controlled\nChemoselective γ‑C(sp3)–H Lactonization\nof Carboxylic Acid: Methyl versus\nMethylene

Figshare
Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
article

Catalyst-Controlled\nChemoselective γ‑C(sp3)–H Lactonization\nof Carboxylic Acid: Methyl versus\nMethylene

article en

Abstract

Despite\nrecent advances in ligand-enabled C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H\nfunctionalization of native substrates, controlling chemoselectivity\nin the presence of methyl and methylene C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H\nbonds remains a significant challenge. Herein, we report the first\nexample of the Pd(II)-catalyzed chemoselective lactonization of γ-methyl\nand methylene C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H bonds of carboxylic acids.\nExclusive chemoselectivity of methyl or methylene γ-lactonization\nwas achieved by using two different classes of Quinoline-Pyridone\nligands. The bidentate ligand coordinating with Pd(II) via five-membered\nchelation favors γ-methyl C–H lactonization, whereas\nthe ligand forming six-membered chelation affords γ-methylene\nC–H lactonization exclusively. Taking into account our previous\nfindings, we show that the impact of ligand bite angle on chemoselectivity\nis different for five-membered and six-membered cyclopalladation processes.\nThis method provides simple and versatile access to γ-lactones,\nincluding spiro- and fused ring systems. Deuterium incorporation experiments\nsuggest that this observed chemoselectivity arises from both the C–H\nactivation and C–O bond forming steps.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.