Cross-ElectrophileCoupling to Form Sterically HinderedC(sp<sup>2</sup>)–C(sp<sup>3</sup>) Bonds: Ni and Co AffordComplementary Reactivity

The formation of sterically hindered C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–C(sp<sup>3</sup>) bonds could be a useful synthetic tool but has been understudied in cross-electrophile coupling. Here, we report two methods that couple secondary alkyl bromides with aryl halides that contain sterically hindered C–X bonds: 1) <i>ortho</i>-substituted aryl bromides with nickel catalysts and 2) di-<i>ortho</i>-substituted aryl iodides with cobalt catalysts. Stoichiometric experiments and deuterium labeling studies show that 1) [Co] is better than [Ni] for oxidative addition of di-<i>ortho</i>-substituted Ar–I and 2) [Co] is better than [Ni] for radical capture/reductive elimination steps with di-<i>ortho</i>-substituted arenes. For both metals, Ar–H side products observed in reactions with low-yielding di-<i>ortho</i>-substituted aryl iodides appear to arise from Ar• formation and hydrogen-atom transfer from the solvent. While the origins of the differences in scope are not yet understood, these studies demonstrate a previously unknown complementarity between nickel and cobalt in cross-electrophile coupling.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c16912.s001
Primary Topic
Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-ElectrophileCoupling to Form Sterically HinderedC(sp2)–C(sp3) Bonds: Ni and Co AffordComplementary Reactivity

Figshare
Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
article

Cross-ElectrophileCoupling to Form Sterically HinderedC(sp2)–C(sp3) Bonds: Ni and Co AffordComplementary Reactivity

article en

Abstract

The formation of sterically hindered C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–C(sp<sup>3</sup>) bonds could be a useful synthetic tool but has been understudied in cross-electrophile coupling. Here, we report two methods that couple secondary alkyl bromides with aryl halides that contain sterically hindered C–X bonds: 1) <i>ortho</i>-substituted aryl bromides with nickel catalysts and 2) di-<i>ortho</i>-substituted aryl iodides with cobalt catalysts. Stoichiometric experiments and deuterium labeling studies show that 1) [Co] is better than [Ni] for oxidative addition of di-<i>ortho</i>-substituted Ar–I and 2) [Co] is better than [Ni] for radical capture/reductive elimination steps with di-<i>ortho</i>-substituted arenes. For both metals, Ar–H side products observed in reactions with low-yielding di-<i>ortho</i>-substituted aryl iodides appear to arise from Ar• formation and hydrogen-atom transfer from the solvent. While the origins of the differences in scope are not yet understood, these studies demonstrate a previously unknown complementarity between nickel and cobalt in cross-electrophile coupling.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cross-ElectrophileCoupling to Form Sterically HinderedC(sp<sup>2</sup>)–C(sp<sup>3</sup>) Bonds: Ni and Co AffordComplementary Reactivity · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS